Teams

PTC NAVY

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-11vs SKY GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesCaren Swan / Rebecca McIlwaine vs Silke Larson / Jocelyn Murphy4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTina Burton / Amy Shearer vs Jennifer Pearson / Sara Visser6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlyson Tittman / Sheila Salyers vs Gayle Long / Paula Daukas6-3, 6-4
2026-06-04vs SS-H GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebbie Lepetsos / Caren Swan vs Kathy Reiner / Holly Carlson6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDawn Larson / Kristin Chapman vs Jeanne Cole / Rhonda Williamson7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAlyson Tittman / Jacqueline Schultz vs Kathryn Root / Lori Honnen3-6, 6-7
2026-05-28vs GTC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesDawn Larson / Caren Swan vs Susan Rosenthal / Karen Ryan6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKristin Chapman / Sheila Salyers vs Nancy Hogue / Susan Bruce6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca McIlwaine / Amy Shearer vs Denise Geiger / Maureen Clarke6-0, 7-5
2026-05-21vs DTP GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca McIlwaine / Debbie Lepetsos vs Kimberly Hitchcock / Kathleen Connell3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDawn Larson / Caren Swan vs AMY SITZE / Robyn Frahm6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesElena Ellcessor / Michelle McDonald vs Deborah Clark / Wendy Berhman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-14vs VC TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Chapman / Dawn Larson vs Annie Cordova / Trisha Barney6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRebecca McIlwaine / Tina Burton vs Kathleen Nisbet / Joanie Mankus6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAlyson Tittman / Jacqueline Schultz vs Stephanie Chichester / Susan Kleimann6-1, 6-0
2026-05-07vs DTC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesRebecca McIlwaine / Tina Burton vs Cherlyn Linden / Marcy Eastman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Chapman / Michelle McDonald vs Pamela Marsh / Dana Pianowski6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebbie Lepetsos / Elena Ellcessor vs Tina Friedman / Ashley Stevens4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-30vs CACM NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheila Salyers / Tina Burton vs Anne Angerman / Lise Uhrich6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDawn Larson / Caren Swan vs Anne Beletic / Christine McKinlay6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDebbie Lepetsos / Elena Ellcessor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Dawn Larson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.04
Kristin Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Caren Swan
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.94
Tina Burton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Sheila Salyers
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Elena Ellcessor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Michelle McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Amy Shearer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Rebecca McIlwaine
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
Debbie Lepetsos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Jacqueline Schultz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Alyson Tittman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elizabeth Stemper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caren Swan + Elizabeth Stemper9171% games+10.1% vs expected
Amy Shearer + Rebecca McIlwaine7655% games+2.2% vs expected
Alyson Tittman + Caren Swan4251% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Lepetsos + Rebecca McIlwaine4257% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Lepetsos + Caren Swan6073% gamesnot enough data
Amy Shearer + Sheila Salyers2354% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Lepetsos + Elena Ellcessor314 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Lepetsos + Sheila Salyers224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dawn Larson
19W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
Kristin Chapman
36W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Caren Swan
146W–83L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Tina Burton
39W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Sheila Salyers
92W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Elena Ellcessor
62W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Michelle McDonald
39W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Amy Shearer
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Rebecca McIlwaine
82W–70L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Debbie Lepetsos
70W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Jacqueline Schultz
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Alyson Tittman
115W–152L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Elizabeth Stemper
15W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.