Teams

DTC BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-11vs CACM NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesCherlyn Linden / Pamela Marsh vs Lise Uhrich / Deborah Yoder2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDana Pianowski / Sheri Jacobs vs Barbara Forman / Suzann Gobis6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAshley Stevens / Lynn Tartell vs Christine McKinlay / Anne Angerman6-3, 7-6
2026-05-28vs SKY GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesPamela Marsh / Cherlyn Linden vs Jennifer Pearson / Sara Visser6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRene Moore / Marcy Eastman vs Silke Larson / Beth Godzich6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAshley Stevens / Lynn Tartell vs Paula Daukas / Gayle Long7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-21vs VC TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcy Eastman / Pamela Marsh vs Janney Carpenter / Elizabeth Anderman6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDana Pianowski / Rene Moore vs Annie Cordova / Joanie Mankus6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTina Friedman / Lynn Tartell vs Page Rollert / Stephanie Chichester6-3, 6-2
2026-05-14vs SS-H GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesCherlyn Linden / Pamela Marsh vs Kathy Reiner / Sherry Ray6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Schindler / Marcy Eastman vs Kathryn Root / Nancy Carlson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTina Friedman / Lynn Tartell vs Lori Honnen / Holly Carlson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-07vs PTC NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesCherlyn Linden / Marcy Eastman vs Rebecca McIlwaine / Tina Burton6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPamela Marsh / Dana Pianowski vs Kristin Chapman / Michelle McDonald2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTina Friedman / Ashley Stevens vs Debbie Lepetsos / Elena Ellcessor6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-30vs GTC BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesMarcy Eastman / Dana Pianowski vs Karen Schuster / Denise Geiger6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSheri Jacobs / Cherlyn Linden vs Maureen Clarke / Susan Rosenthal6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAshley Stevens / Lynn Tartell vs Jennifer Bogert / Karen Ryan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-04vs DTP GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesDana Pianowski / Cherlyn Linden vs Kathleen Connell / Kimberly Hitchcock2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLynn Tartell / Marcy Eastman vs AMY SITZE / Heather Colliander6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Schindler / Ashley Stevens vs Julie Madden / Wendy Berhman6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Dana Pianowski
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.87
Cherlyn Linden
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.84
Marcy Eastman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Pamela Marsh
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.72
Rene Moore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Ashley Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Lynn Tartell
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.55
Tina Friedman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Schindler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kimberly Nanke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherlyn Linden + Marcy Eastman4159% games+7.4% vs expected
Cherlyn Linden + Kimberly Nanke5255% games+3.2% vs expected
Cherlyn Linden + Pamela Marsh5161% games+2.3% vs expected
Cherlyn Linden + Dana Pianowski4354% games−0.9% vs expected
Pamela Marsh + Dana Pianowski12857% games−1.0% vs expected
Rene Moore + Pamela Marsh1534% games−2.4% vs expected
Marcy Eastman + Kimberly Nanke5650% games−4.5% vs expected
Marcy Eastman + Tina Friedman4249% games−6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dana Pianowski
51W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Cherlyn Linden
74W–73L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Marcy Eastman
90W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
Pamela Marsh
61W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
Rene Moore
20W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Ashley Stevens
30W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Lynn Tartell
25W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
2.65
Tina Friedman
38W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.55
Julie Schindler
32W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Nanke
47W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.