Teams

BROADSTONE RC CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.81 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-29vs BROADSTONE RC CW7.5CLost 12
W#1 DoublesGayle Tanner / Lori Reading-Foster vs Stacey Matteoli / Maggie Mei Choy6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAudriana Ketchersid / Barbara Biglieri vs May Bhetraratana / Mary Heller4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDarui Jiang / Jing Yuan vs AJ Pruett / Dawn Perkins2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-09-20vs BROADSTONE RC CW7.5CLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiem Le / Heather Burnham vs May Bhetraratana / Laurie Larson2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Blanford / Kirsten Wilson-Trowbridge vs Lynda Rose Purser / Ruth Ruffe6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDarui Jiang / Jing Yuan vs Brianna Schneider / Betty Williams3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Karen Quidachay
published
3.91
Rayane Agha
published
3.87
Gayle Tanner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Darui Jiang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Julie Blanford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Audriana Ketchersid
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Stacy Whittingham
published
3.66
Heather Burnham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.61
Vivi Zhang
published
3.60
Denise Kimes
published 4
3.45
Lori Reading-Foster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Barbara Biglieri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Jing Yuan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Katrin Chutka
published
3.32
Kirsten Wilson-Trowbridge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Gloria Liu
published 3.5
3.27
Julie Kawahara
published
3.17
Diem Le
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Larisa Johnson-Tong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Reading-Foster + Diem Le2350% gamesnot enough data
Heather Burnham + Denise Kimes314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Quidachay + Stacy Whittingham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Quidachay
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
Rayane Agha
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Gayle Tanner
25W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Darui Jiang
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Julie Blanford
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Audriana Ketchersid
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Whittingham
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Heather Burnham
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
Vivi Zhang
24W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
4
Denise Kimes
14W–18L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.60
Lori Reading-Foster
18W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Barbara Biglieri
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
Jing Yuan
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.38
Katrin Chutka
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Kirsten Wilson-Trowbridge
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Gloria Liu
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Julie Kawahara
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Diem Le
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Larisa Johnson-Tong
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.