Teams

WP ORANGE

2022 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-21vs TTA BLUEWon 10
W#2 Female SinglesKatie Oppliger vs Tara Tovar6-0, 6-0
2022-07-14vs BP REDWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesRachel Vue / Carolyn Welter vs Kristin VonSpreecken / Molly Buller6-2, 6-3
2022-07-07vs LPTC REDWon 20
W#1 Female SinglesKatie Oppliger vs Lauren Flynn6-0, 6-3
W#2 Female SinglesMaureen Connor vs Laura Steeby6-1, 6-0
2022-06-16vs GPTC TEALWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesCarolyn Welter / Maureen Connor vs Aly Pacetti / Veronica Lequire6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Katie Oppliger
usually #1 Female Singles 50%, also #2 Female Singles 50% · published 4
3.88
Kelly Connor
published
3.51
Annie Rapson
published 3.5
3.49
Cynthia Lopez
published 3.5
3.38
Maureen Connor
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Carolyn Welter
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Rachel Vue
published
3.23
Shereen Sairafi
published
3.07
Katie Kennedy
published
Lindsey Bieging
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Kennedy + Annie Rapson8257% games+7.6% vs expected
Katie Kennedy + Carolyn Welter3247% gamesnot enough data
Katie Kennedy + Kelly Connor134 matchesnot enough data
Katie Kennedy + Lindsey Bieging134 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Welter + Maureen Connor224 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey Bieging + Maureen Connor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katie Oppliger
69W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
4.01
Kelly Connor
29W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
3.5
Annie Rapson
46W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Cynthia Lopez
43W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Maureen Connor
29W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Carolyn Welter
34W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Rachel Vue
33W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Shereen Sairafi
25W–11L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Katie Kennedy
26W–30L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.07
Lindsey Bieging
8W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.