Teams

TTA BLUE

2022 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-21vs WP ORANGELost 02
L#1 Female DoublesSarah Vincent / Kelsa Morgan vs Lindsey Bieging / Annie Rapson4-6, 2-6
L#2 Female SinglesTara Tovar vs Katie Oppliger0-6, 0-6
2022-07-20vs GTC REDWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesTara Tovar / Sarah Vincent vs Katelin Ramer / Caroline Slowinski6-4, 7-6
2022-07-07vs GPTC TEALWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesTara Tovar / Sarah Vincent vs Lindsay Gordon / Laine Pacetti6-3, 6-1
W#1 Female SinglesOlimpia Mejia vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-02vs NJ BLACKSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesKelsa Morgan / Olimpia Mejia vs Pam Long / Maggie Carson6-4, 6-1
L#1 Female SinglesKaylee Henley vs Caitlin Bock3-6, 3-6
2022-06-16vs BP REDLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesTara Tovar / Kelsa Morgan vs Cayti Stein / Karleigh Kimble7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 Female SinglesKaylee Henley vs Hilary Navy3-6, 2-6
W#2 Female SinglesOlimpia Mejia vs Clarissa Manzi6-0, 6-2
2022-06-09vs LPTC REDWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesKelsa Morgan / Sarah Vincent vs Laura Steeby / Lauren Flynn6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 Female SinglesOlimpia Mejia vs Sara Springer6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Olimpia Mejia
usually #1 Female Singles 50%, also #2 Female Singles 25% · published 4
3.41
Kaylee Henley
usually #1 Female Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Stephanie Saunders
published
3.27
Sarah Vincent
published
3.01
Tara Tovar
usually #1 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Kelsa Morgan
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kayla Kohake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Tovar + Kelsa Morgan41046% games−3.7% vs expected
Kelsa Morgan + Kaylee Henley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Olimpia Mejia
101W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.95
3.5
Kaylee Henley
105W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
Stephanie Saunders
33W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Sarah Vincent
41W–26L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Tara Tovar
30W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Kelsa Morgan
39W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.88
Kayla Kohake
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.