Teams

CCC-Jackson

2025 · 26 NEGTA USTA Mixed 40 & Over - Fall

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-13vs NEGTA/Kathryn BettencourtLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Holcomb / Stacy King vs Matthew Ziesmer / Kathryn Bettencourt2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Norton / AMANDA NORTON vs Steve Slowick / Melissa Danielson0-6, 4-6
2025-11-06vs Harbour Point-BellLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Norton / AMANDA NORTON vs Greg Sexton / DeAnna Emborski6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEd Hoosh / Stacy King vs Vince Buono / Lisa Coffee2-6, 4-6
2025-10-30vs Alberta Banks-KmieciakLost 02
L#1 DoublesFred Rosenkampff / Pamela Jackson vs Jennifer Druse / Andy Johnson1-6, 0-4
L#3 DoublesRobert Norton / AMANDA NORTON vs Dawn Jabloner / Christopher Corwin0-6, 2-6
2025-10-23vs NEGTA/Kathryn BettencourtWon 21
L#1 DoublesFred Rosenkampff / Pamela Hoosh vs Kathryn Bettencourt / Matthew Ziesmer1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Holcomb / Stacy King vs John Carter / Donna Shewbert6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEd Hoosh / Pamela Jackson vs Brent Danielson / Melissa Danielson6-2, 7-6
2025-10-16vs Harbour Point-BellLost 12
W#1 DoublesAMANDA NORTON / Fred Rosenkampff vs Dean Massey / Sumi So6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEd Hoosh / Stacy King vs Michael Moses / Mary Bell1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Norton / Pamela Hoosh vs Vince Buono / Lisa Coffee1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-10-09vs Alberta Banks-KmieciakSplit 11
L#2 DoublesWilliam Holcomb / Stacy King vs Craig Jabloner / Dawn Jabloner3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPamela Jackson / Fred Rosenkampff vs Randy Kmieciak / Kristen McFry6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 26 NEGTA USTA Mixed 40 & Over - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Alberta Banks-Kmieciak4211715126
2NEGTA/Kathryn Bettencourt4211715128
3Harbour Point-Bell3381023168
4CCC-Jackson1561224171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Amy Pope
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Fred Rosenkampff
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
AMANDA NORTON
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.25
Brian Gillespie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.22
Pamela Jackson
published
3.15
Pamela Hoosh
usually #1 Singles 82%, also #1 Doubles 9% · published
2.61
Ed Hoosh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Lindsey McCamy
usually #2 Doubles 65%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Robert Norton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Stacy King
published
William Holcomb
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

AMANDA NORTON + Robert Norton044 matchesnot enough data
Amy Pope + AMANDA NORTON213 matchesnot enough data
Brian Gillespie + Lindsey McCamy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Pope
19W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Fred Rosenkampff
2W–2L career · type M · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
AMANDA NORTON
28W–29L career · 20 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Brian Gillespie
6W–4L career · type M · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Pamela Jackson
4W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.22
Pamela Hoosh
6W–27L career · 11 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Ed Hoosh
2W–3L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
Lindsey McCamy
32W–18L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Norton
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacy King
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
William Holcomb
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.