Teams

SOLANO TA/IN-SHAPE: RANCHO SOLANO 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Donna Murphy
published
3.67
Raquel Barrera
published
3.55
Tracy Dennis
published
3.36
Monica Ravanello
published
3.35
Helen Dangtran
published
3.35
Wendy Farjat
published
3.30
Gloria Spencer
published
3.22
Swaran Williams
published
3.19
Magaly Otero
published
3.19
Edlira Muratas
published
3.14
Nancy Orellana
published
3.09
Kimberly Thoma
published
3.04
Danielle Willis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Cynthia Oanes
published 3.5
2.84
Josephine Rosman
published
Bobbi Jacoby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Carmen Dwyer
published 3
2.67
Annabelle Marie
published 3
Leanne Outlaw Rahn
published
Mary Burklow
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Tatiana Orellana
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Magaly Otero + Kimberly Thoma213 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Dennis + Donna Murphy303 matchesnot enough data
Donna Murphy + Monica Ravanello213 matchesnot enough data
Raquel Barrera + Gloria Spencer213 matchesnot enough data
Gloria Spencer + Monica Ravanello123 matchesnot enough data
Helen Dangtran + Monica Ravanello303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donna Murphy
26W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.85
Raquel Barrera
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.67
Tracy Dennis
18W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
Monica Ravanello
26W–25L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Helen Dangtran
17W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Wendy Farjat
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
Gloria Spencer
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
Swaran Williams
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Magaly Otero
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Edlira Muratas
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Nancy Orellana
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Kimberly Thoma
17W–20L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Danielle Willis
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Cynthia Oanes
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
2.97
Josephine Rosman
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Bobbi Jacoby
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Carmen Dwyer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Annabelle Marie
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Leanne Outlaw Rahn
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Burklow
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tatiana Orellana
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.