Teams

SGV Joie de Vivre-Gruaz-Flint Cyn/SA12

2025 SoCal FALL Team Singles · SGV - Women 3.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-08vs SGV FLoBS-Willaman-Scholl CYN/SU5Lost 01
L#2 SinglesCarla Denker vs Andrea Wong3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKris Gruaz vs Sean Ky2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesFeiming Morgan vs Sarah Kloepfer6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesGrace Parker vs Terry Meng0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-11-01vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SAWon 10
W#2 SinglesCarla Denker vs GINA SKIBAR6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCarla Denker vs Katie Lagen3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesAntoinette Lessuk vs Angeline Chow6-4, 7-5
2025-10-05vs SGV FLoBS-Willaman-Scholl CYN/SU5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCarla Denker vs Claire Rifelj1-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesAntoinette Lessuk vs Quynh Nghiem6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Nancy Pashayan
published 3.5
3.30
Feiming Morgan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.30
Erin Newsome Moltz
published
3.24
Antoinette Lessuk
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Carla Denker
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Sandy Mandel
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Kris Gruaz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Grace Parker
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Antoinette Lessuk + Carla Denker211457% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nancy Pashayan
61W–74L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Feiming Morgan
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Erin Newsome Moltz
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
3.5
Antoinette Lessuk
164W–156L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Carla Denker
158W–132L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Sandy Mandel
70W–85L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
Kris Gruaz
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Grace Parker
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.