Teams

USTA Campus-Alvarez

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 40 & Over- SPRING-DAY · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over- Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-30vs Lake Cane-Tuckerman-Ace KickersWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Chang / Silvia Landgraf vs Valerie Hershiser / Angela Tuckerman6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesLisa Chang / Laura Nemes vs Jillian Baptiste / Kathleen Sipio3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLisa Chang / Kristine Neville vs Kelly Green / Cherie DePriest6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-09vs Lake Cane-Yari-Kender/PhanWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Chang / Kristine Neville vs ROSANA MONTEIRO / Lily Kender4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-02vs USTA Campus-HemphillLost 01
L#1 SinglesLisa Chang vs Xia Yang4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-04-25vs Country Club of Orlando-MillerWon 10
W#1 SinglesLisa Chang vs Ginny Botts6-3, 6-0
W#1 DoublesKristine Neville / Michele Hunter vs Irene Kow / Meredith Gallagher6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDaisy Alvarez / Marites Tandoc vs Michelle Ford / Marquita Shiever6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesXiaohong Tu / Silvia Landgraf vs Adrienne Ransom / Jennifer Certo6-3, 6-0
W#4 DoublesDenice Jahreis / Julie Dupree vs Selen Gokce / Bridget Bruguiere6-2, 6-3
2025-04-11vs USTA Campus-VinsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Chang / Donghui Zhang vs Judith Melendez / Alida Astudillo3-6, 2-6
2025-04-04vs Lake Cane - O’MalleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Chang / Kristine Neville vs Hazel Cooke / Ira Frota6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Melissa Trickett
published
3.32
Kristine Neville
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Donghui Zhang
published
3.29
Marites Tandoc
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Lisa Chang
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Michele Hunter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Xiaohong Tu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Daisy Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Silvia Landgraf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Denice Jahreis
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Laura Nemes
published
3.08
Ali Goss
published 3.5
Stella Liu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Trickett + Xiaohong Tu3245% games−6.4% vs expected
Donghui Zhang + Silvia Landgraf123 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Trickett + Daisy Alvarez303 matchesnot enough data
Michele Hunter + Kristine Neville123 matchesnot enough data
Marites Tandoc + Daisy Alvarez303 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Neville + Denice Jahreis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Trickett
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kristine Neville
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Donghui Zhang
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Marites Tandoc
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Lisa Chang
84W–68L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Michele Hunter
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Xiaohong Tu
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Daisy Alvarez
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Silvia Landgraf
12W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Denice Jahreis
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Laura Nemes
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Ali Goss
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.08
Stella Liu
18W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.