Teams

Samuell Grand/Young W4.0S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-11-10vs High Point/Villalobos W4.0SLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmber Morefield / Lisa Buitron vs Theresa Batoon / Jannine Soldan1-6, 2-6
2024-10-27Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Sepulveda / Lisa Lajous vs Gina Manning / Megan Ensign3-6, 3-6
2024-10-20vs Greenhill/Schonwald-Newberg W4.0SLost 12
W#1 DoublesGeraldine Brown / Lisa Buitron vs Rosalyn Luong / Wendy Korenman7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesDana Koerner vs Kerry Schonwald3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Lajous / Michelle Sepulveda vs Stacy Nobles / Robyn Krivacic6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanis Barbash / Lisa Lajous vs Winnie Stimmel / Tracye Kenney6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Hefner / Dana Koerner vs Amy Schneiderman / Jennifer Davis6-1, 6-1
2024-10-06vs Canyon Creek/Gonzalez W4.0SWon 10
W#1 DoublesEllen Oliver / Dana Koerner vs Mollie Romness / Dawn Ritz2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-29Won 10
W#2 DoublesAundi Henderson / Lisa Buitron vs Amy Wandstrat / Jessica Pierce6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesLisa Buitron / Ellen Oliver vs Laura Locke / Sandi Shipley6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAundi Henderson / Lisa Lajous vs Amy Koonsman / Andrea Taylor1-6, 1-6
2024-09-15vs Fretz/Jeffery-Liu W4.0SSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDana Koerner / Ellen Oliver vs Paula Brunson / Barbara Forkel7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAmber Morefield / Lisa Buitron vs Sophie Nini / Becky Connet6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2024-09-08vs Wagon Wheel/Craft W4.0SLost 02
L#1 SinglesDana Koerner vs Shanda Nation2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmber Morefield / Lisa Buitron vs Amanda Craft / Judy Barbo6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Janis Barbash
published
3.98
Ellen Oliver
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.88
Sarah Wollitz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Lisa Buitron
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Dana Koerner
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.74
Lisa Lajous
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Katie Tran
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
3.70
Julie Fetter
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.64
Elizabeth Vice
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Danielle White
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.57
Michelle Hefner
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Amber Morefield
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Sarah Hamlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Aundi Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.23
Michelle Sepulveda
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
Geraldine Brown
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aundi Henderson + Lisa Buitron7356% games+6.5% vs expected
Katie Tran + Danielle White6156% games+1.4% vs expected
Amber Morefield + Lisa Buitron5550% games−1.1% vs expected
Katie Tran + Michelle Hefner303 matchesnot enough data
Dana Koerner + Ellen Oliver213 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Hefner + Danielle White213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Lajous + Michelle Sepulveda123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janis Barbash
43W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Ellen Oliver
33W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Sarah Wollitz
35W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
Lisa Buitron
19W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Dana Koerner
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Lajous
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
Katie Tran
33W–19L career · 9 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Julie Fetter
4W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Elizabeth Vice
20W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Danielle White
18W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.64
Michelle Hefner
30W–40L career · 9 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Amber Morefield
35W–31L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Sarah Hamlin
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.35
3.5
Aundi Henderson
32W–28L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Michelle Sepulveda
8W–14L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Geraldine Brown
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.