Teams

LSHudson/Edgemoor

2023 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Men 3.5 Thurs pm

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-11vs LGSimonetti-Orr/WestportWon 20
W#1 DoublesScott Hudson / Jeffrey McCue vs Jonathan Aberle / Peter Norelli7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTimothy Vallejos / John Chidwick vs Jeff Williford / Edward Levy6-1, 6-1
2023-05-04vs LTST-Stephen/CSDLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeffrey McCue / Timothy Vallejos vs Ivan Ruyle / Mayilvaganan Kasipandi2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-04vs LBHolden/Jetton 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTimothy Vallejos / Timothy Hallman vs Jim Beam / Paul Thompson2-6, 3-6
2023-04-20vs LBWard/RRCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Hudson / Timothy Vallejos vs Ben Ward / Charles Utz5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesChris Rush / Jeffrey McCue vs Dimitris Papageorgiou / Thomas Noyes6-4, 6-4
2023-04-06vs LJBorder/PeninsulaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris Rush / Jeffrey McCue vs Clarence Bush / Richard Dandurand6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTimothy Vallejos / Richard Fogel vs Markus Herrmann / Douglas Matheson1-6, 0-6
2023-03-23vs LDBA-Baker/NMP 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJeffrey McCue / Chris Rush vs Dushyant Balasubramani / Joseph Davis1-6, 0-6
2023-03-16vs LJLA-Lands/NMPWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Chidwick / Jeffrey McCue vs John Padgett / Chris Harrington6-3, 6-0
2023-03-09vs LRHerrmann/Brower/LNTCLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeffrey McCue / Richard Procissi vs Ron Herrmann / Norm Marttila2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 Thurs pm have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Jeffrey McCue
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.31
Chris Rush
published 3.5
3.29
William Wingo
published
3.10
Timothy Vallejos
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
2.92
Richard Fogel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Vallejos + Jeffrey McCue62741% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeffrey McCue
70W–105L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Chris Rush
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
William Wingo
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Timothy Vallejos
84W–144L career · 11 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
Richard Fogel
10W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.