Teams

LBWard/RRCC

2023 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Men 3.5 Thurs pm

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-11vs LTST-Stephen/CSDWon 10
W#1 SinglesNewell Daly vs Eugene Olsen6-2, 6-4
2023-05-01vs LJBorder/PeninsulaSplit 11
W#1 SinglesNewell Daly vs Thomas Larson6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBradley Bolick / Jeff Hibbeler vs Chris Harrison / Douglas Matheson5-7, 3-6
2023-04-20vs LSHudson/EdgemoorWon 10
W#1 SinglesNewell Daly vs William Wingo7-6, 7-5
2023-04-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesNewell Daly vs Kishan Maramraj6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesNewell Daly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-23vs LRHerrmann/Brower/LNTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Noyes / Jeff Hibbeler vs Norm Marttila / Ronnie George1-6, 4-6
2023-03-16vs LGSimonetti-Orr/WestportLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Hibbeler / Stephen Noe vs Chip Ashley / Shawn Dagley3-6, 0-6
2023-03-09vs LBHolden/Jetton 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNewell Daly / Henry Neale vs Ben Holden / Steven Porter2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 Thurs pm have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Anthony Miller
published 4
3.46
Charles Utz
published 3.5
3.30
3.26
Jeff Hibbeler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Newell Daly
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.07
Bradley Bolick
published 3.5
3.00
Jay Harris
published
2.95
Stephen Noe
published
Henry Neale
published
Thomas Noyes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Hibbeler + Newell Daly123 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Noe + Newell Daly123 matchesnot enough data
Dimitris Papageorgiou + Newell Daly123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anthony Miller
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.91
3.5
Charles Utz
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
Dimitris Papageorgiou
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Jeff Hibbeler
93W–106L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Newell Daly
33W–74L career · 6 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Bradley Bolick
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Jay Harris
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
Stephen Noe
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
Henry Neale
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Noyes
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.