Teams

C 7.5M MV Gau

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5M TP Leffler000000
2C 7.5M MM Kumar000000
3C 7.5M PW Lonsway000000
4C 7.5M PW Mikolich000000
5C 7.5M MM Viswanathan000000
6C 7.5M MV Falcone000000
7C 7.5M AS Smith000000
8C 7.5M MV Gau000000
9C 7.5M CV Payerl000000
10C 7.5M WR Hoffman000000
11C 7.5M WE Elefter000000
12C 7.5M CRC Cole000000
13C 7.5M NC Fletcher000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Fye
published 4
3.36
Robert Haught
published
3.31
Bob Berichon
published 3.5
3.21
Preet Kang
published
3.19
Seth Vilensky
published
3.19
Garnett Meador
published
3.07
Jack Gau
published
Gary Fleming
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bob Berichon + Jack Gau8361% games+9.6% vs expected
Robert Haught + Bob Berichon4165% games+9.3% vs expected
Garnett Meador + Jack Gau2343% gamesnot enough data
Garnett Meador + Bob Berichon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Fye
26W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Haught
99W–59L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Bob Berichon
85W–53L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Preet Kang
43W–55L career · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
Seth Vilensky
56W–36L career · no lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Garnett Meador
58W–61L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Jack Gau
62W–74L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Gary Fleming
38W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.