Teams

C 7.5M PW Mikolich

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings13 teams · NEOTA 7.5 Combo Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5M TP Leffler000000
2C 7.5M MM Kumar000000
3C 7.5M PW Lonsway000000
4C 7.5M PW Mikolich000000
5C 7.5M MM Viswanathan000000
6C 7.5M MV Falcone000000
7C 7.5M AS Smith000000
8C 7.5M MV Gau000000
9C 7.5M CV Payerl000000
10C 7.5M WR Hoffman000000
11C 7.5M WE Elefter000000
12C 7.5M CRC Cole000000
13C 7.5M NC Fletcher000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Seungki Min
published
3.83
David Rickard
published 4
3.81
Doug Ott
published 4
3.77
Mark Osoteo
published
3.75
David Fleischer
published 4
3.67
Jim Mikolich
published
3.64
Matthew Horwich
published
3.53
Nick Karas
published
3.41
Dietrich Schelzig
published 3.5
H Michael Wiant
published 3.5
3.19
Doug Michelsen
published 3.5
3.16
Bob Nicolay
published 3.5
3.09
Kevin Dieterich
published
2.98
Patrick Brogan
published
Stuart Scott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nick Karas + David Rickard12264% games+11.3% vs expected
Mark Osoteo + Jim Mikolich17659% games+2.5% vs expected
Jim Mikolich + Stuart Scott8060% games−3.7% vs expected
David Fleischer + David Rickard11556% games−5.0% vs expected
David Fleischer + Mark Osoteo6459% gamesnot enough data
Doug Ott + David Fleischer5162% gamesnot enough data
Doug Michelsen + Kevin Dieterich4261% gamesnot enough data
Jim Mikolich + David Rickard4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Seungki Min
45W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
David Rickard
117W–55L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Doug Ott
133W–69L career · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Mark Osoteo
79W–37L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
David Fleischer
88W–46L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Jim Mikolich
81W–33L career · no lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
Matthew Horwich
118W–150L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Nick Karas
62W–29L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Dietrich Schelzig
94W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
H Michael Wiant
21W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Doug Michelsen
83W–68L career · no lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Bob Nicolay
31W–25L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kevin Dieterich
36W–32L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Patrick Brogan
15W–20L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Stuart Scott
36W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.