Teams

KY/LOU/WHITMER

2026 USTA SINGLES 40 & OVER ADULTLOUISVILLE · 3.0 WOMEN

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-26vs KY/LOU/MEAGHERWon 30
W#1 SinglesBeth Tinsley vs Tamy Holmes6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJessica Whitmer vs Ursula Melhuish6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesErin Frazier vs Jessica Scheiner6-4, 6-2
2026-08-18vs KY/LOU/MEAGHERWon 10
W#1 SinglesBeth Tinsley vs Ursula Melhuish6-4, 6-2
2026-08-06vs KY/LOU/MEAGHERWon 20
W#1 SinglesLaura Ochsner vs Ursula Melhuish6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesAnjali Ajmani vs Mary Beth Meagher6-2, 6-4
2026-07-21vs KY/LOU/MEAGHERSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJessica Whitmer vs Jennifer Fisher6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesErin Frazier vs Tamy Holmes2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-13vs KY/LOU/MEAGHERWon 21
L#1 SinglesJessica Whitmer vs Jennifer Fisher5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLaura Ochsner vs Theresa Neichter6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesBeth Tinsley vs Jessica Scheiner2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-09vs KY/LOU/MEAGHERSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLaura Ochsner vs Stephanie Saxton0-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesJessica Whitmer vs Jennifer Williams6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/WHITMER5011410108
2KY/LOU/MEAGHER0541123158

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Beth Tinsley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.83
Anjali Ajmani
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.79
Laura Ochsner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.77
Jessica Whitmer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.68
Lauren Alderman
published
2.56
Erin Frazier
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Tinsley + Erin Frazier134 matchesnot enough data
Erin Frazier + Lauren Alderman224 matchesnot enough data
Erin Frazier + Jessica Whitmer134 matchesnot enough data
Anjali Ajmani + Jessica Whitmer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Beth Tinsley
25W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Anjali Ajmani
19W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Laura Ochsner
24W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
Jessica Whitmer
34W–27L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Lauren Alderman
12W–15L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Erin Frazier
18W–35L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.