Teams

KY/LOU/MEAGHER

2026 USTA SINGLES 40 & OVER ADULTLOUISVILLE · 3.0 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-26vs KY/LOU/WHITMERLost 03
L#1 SinglesTamy Holmes vs Beth Tinsley3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesUrsula Melhuish vs Jessica Whitmer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJessica Scheiner vs Erin Frazier4-6, 2-6
2026-08-18vs KY/LOU/WHITMERLost 02
L#1 SinglesUrsula Melhuish vs Beth Tinsley4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTheresa Neichter vs Sarah Ferguson0-6, 4-6
2026-08-06vs KY/LOU/WHITMERLost 12
L#1 SinglesUrsula Melhuish vs Laura Ochsner2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJessica Scheiner vs Sarah Ferguson7-6, 6-3
L#3 SinglesMary Beth Meagher vs Anjali Ajmani2-6, 4-6
2026-07-21vs KY/LOU/WHITMERSplit 11
L#2 SinglesJessica Scheiner vs Sarah Ferguson1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesTamy Holmes vs Erin Frazier6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-13vs KY/LOU/WHITMERLost 02
L#2 SinglesTheresa Neichter vs Laura Ochsner4-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesJessica Scheiner vs Beth Tinsley6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-07-09vs KY/LOU/WHITMERSplit 11
W#1 SinglesStephanie Saxton vs Laura Ochsner6-0, 7-6
L#3 SinglesJina Kang vs Sarah Ferguson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/WHITMER5011410108
2KY/LOU/MEAGHER0541123158

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Stephanie Saxton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.94
Jina Kang
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.81
Tamy Holmes
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.78
Mary Beth Meagher
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.77
Lindsay Obrien
published
2.72
Jessica Scheiner
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.68
Theresa Neichter
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.66
Ursula Melhuish
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Scheiner + Mary Beth Meagher134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Saxton
36W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Jina Kang
20W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Tamy Holmes
16W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81
Mary Beth Meagher
19W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Lindsay Obrien
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Jessica Scheiner
16W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Theresa Neichter
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Ursula Melhuish
23W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.