Teams

RCW - Zink

2022 USTA 18 & Over League · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.06 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesSean Pyle / Grant Sprunger vs Jara Welker / Austin Plantz1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCarson Stoltzfus vs Kyle MacIntire1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTyler Coder / Jerrad Seifrit vs Steve Spong / Ryan Nguyen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-14vs West Shore - BischofLost 04
L#1 DoublesJared Sumar / Sean Pyle vs Thomas Bischof / Joshua Ringquist3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCarson Stoltzfus vs Jason Ringquist2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGrant Sprunger / Lionel Chiong vs MARK VOGEL / Jeffrey Kirkhoff3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesEric Glatsky vs Andrew Stephenson3-6, 5-7
2022-07-09vs Hempfield - HannaLost 12
L#1 DoublesGrant Sprunger / Jerrad Seifrit vs Andrew Burd / John Eichenlaub5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEric Glatsky vs Shane Holbein6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAriff Sumar / Joe Schrader vs Matthew Hanna / Darryl Wende4-6, 3-6
2022-06-29vs West Shore - BischofLost 04
L#1 DoublesGrant Sprunger / Jerrad Seifrit vs Joshua Ringquist / Jason Ringquist2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCarson Stoltzfus vs Chad Evanoff0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLionel Chiong / Sean Pyle vs MARK VOGEL / Andrew Schreck2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesGrant Conway vs Jeffrey Kirkhoff5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-25vs Lebanon Valley College - KlecknerLost 03
L#1 DoublesZach Manifold / Grant Conway vs Elliott Kleckner / Brady McLucas0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCarson Stoltzfus vs Michael Schuetz3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEric Glatsky / Ariff Sumar vs Mark Seaton / Kevin Rowland1-6, 1-6
2022-06-19vs Hempfield - HannaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSean Pyle / Eric Glatsky vs Matthew Hanna / Sang Hyun Lim4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesGrant Conway vs Nick Nalywayko6-3, 6-1
2022-06-09vs Lebanon Valley College - KlecknerLost 05
L#1 DoublesGrant Sprunger / Jerrad Seifrit vs Elliott Kleckner / Adam Warren1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGrant Conway vs Damir Cuturic1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLionel Chiong / Sean Pyle vs Rye Morris / Reed Morris1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCarson Stoltzfus vs Dino Cuturic2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJoe Schrader / Tyler Coder vs Mark Seaton / Alex Corcoran5-7, 3-6
2022-05-26vs RCW - SumarLost 04
L#1 DoublesGrant Sprunger / Sean Pyle vs Peter Dodd / Robert Williams1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesEric Glatsky vs Noah Ginder3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Schrader / Jerrad Seifrit vs Jeffery Arters / John Jahoda3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCarson Stoltzfus vs Matthew DeBord2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEric Glatsky vs Jara Welker6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSean Pyle / Grant Sprunger vs Wilson Wolfe / Steve Spong6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJerrad Seifrit vs James Schmidt2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ben Zink
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5.5
Carson Stoltzfus
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Grant Conway
usually #1 Singles 82%, also #2 Singles 9% · published 4
Grant Sprunger
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.70
Eric Glatsky
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.54
Joe Schrader
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.41
Ariff Sumar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Zach Manifold
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.20
Ronald Baker
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.11
Jared Sumar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jerrad Seifrit
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lionel Chiong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sean Pyle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronald Baker + Zach Manifold191951% games+5.3% vs expected
Ariff Sumar + Eric Glatsky221155% games−2.6% vs expected
Ariff Sumar + Joe Schrader3452% games−6.9% vs expected
Grant Sprunger + Jerrad Seifrit0631% gamesnot enough data
Eric Glatsky + Jared Sumar134 matchesnot enough data
Ariff Sumar + Jared Sumar123 matchesnot enough data
Lionel Chiong + Joe Schrader123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5.5
Ben Zink
3W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Carson Stoltzfus
12W–17L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Grant Conway
29W–21L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Grant Sprunger
8W–29L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Eric Glatsky
286W–231L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Joe Schrader
184W–119L career · 7 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Ariff Sumar
189W–163L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Zach Manifold
122W–136L career · 15 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
Ronald Baker
74W–57L career · 14 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Jared Sumar
10W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jerrad Seifrit
3W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lionel Chiong
86W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sean Pyle
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.