Teams

WNC T Reeks (AP)

Combo 18 & Over USTA WNC 2023 · WNC Combo 7.5 Adult Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WNC Combo 7.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Margaret Deutsch
published
Deborah James
published 4
3.72
Susanna Saidi
published
3.67
Edie Hobson
published
3.66
Beth Meacham
published 4
3.64
Janet Sweezey
published
3.62
Kelly Haycook
published
3.58
Mary Ann Wendel
published
3.58
Sarah Corley
published
3.48
Vivian Gibson
published
3.40
Tricia Reeks
published
Celeste Sandridge
published 3.5
Jodi DeVerges
published
Kimberly Kneier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Meacham + Vivian Gibson3644% games+3.2% vs expected
Janet Sweezey + Beth Meacham044 matchesnot enough data
Susanna Saidi + Beth Meacham224 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Reeks + Beth Meacham213 matchesnot enough data
Beth Meacham + Margaret Deutsch303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Deutsch
98W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Deborah James
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susanna Saidi
19W–28L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Edie Hobson
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Beth Meacham
30W–35L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
Janet Sweezey
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
Kelly Haycook
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
Mary Ann Wendel
15W–25L career · no lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
3.58
Sarah Corley
11W–26L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Vivian Gibson
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Tricia Reeks
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Celeste Sandridge
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jodi DeVerges
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Kneier
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.