Teams

VC TEAL

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-12vs PTC NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesJanney Carpenter / Annie Cordova vs Sheila Salyers / Elizabeth Stemper1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Hoskins / Joanie Mankus vs Amy Shearer / Rebecca McIlwaine2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Stephanie Chichester vs Kirsten Mau / Alyson Tittman1-6, 1-6
2025-06-05vs SS-H GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesTrisha Barney / Joanie Mankus vs Marjery Clark / Rosemarie Kucharski6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Chichester / Nancy Fridstein vs Linda Backus / Kari Graham1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Nisbet / Annie Cordova vs Lynn Gifford / Ann Koets6-3, 6-2
2025-05-29vs PRKR REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesTrisha Barney / Janney Carpenter vs Toni Payne / Cindi Turchik7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Anderman / Stephanie Chichester vs Aura Leigh Ferguson / Beth Laverenz7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Joanie Mankus vs Darlene Odean / Elaine Tyson2-6, 5-7
2025-05-22vs CPV NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Hoskins / Annie Cordova vs Susan Boerema / Sherry Wynne3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTrisha Barney / Nancy Fridstein vs Betsy Heggie / Andrea Smart3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Nisbet / Joanie Mankus vs Jill Skinner / Nicki Erdle1-6, 2-6
2025-05-15vs HRCA-N YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesTrisha Barney / Kathy Hoskins vs Dee Everitt / Tina Ruggiero3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanney Carpenter / Annie Cordova vs Carole LaBounty / Barbara Chapman6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Kathleen Nisbet vs Barbara Adamson / Irene Scott4-6, 6-7
2025-05-08vs RRTC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Hoskins / Trisha Barney vs Cheryl Georg / Christy Battaglia2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoanie Mankus / Stephanie Chichester vs Amy Lange / Kit Levoy6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Kathleen Nisbet vs Pam Ammann / Kathy Piquette2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-01vs PRC ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Fridstein / Kathy Hoskins vs Emily Dreyer / Sharon Kisch5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJanney Carpenter / Elizabeth Anderman vs Lori Lee / Celeste Gardner2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Chichester / Kathleen Nisbet vs Teresa Crystal / Teresa Hahn4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Kathy Hoskins
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.75
Janney Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Annie Cordova
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Elizabeth Anderman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Stephanie Chichester
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.29
Nancy Fridstein
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.15
Kathleen Nisbet
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joanie Mankus
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Trisha Barney
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Chichester + Nancy Fridstein3451% games+9.7% vs expected
Kathleen Nisbet + Nancy Fridstein6751% games+3.0% vs expected
Kathleen Nisbet + Joanie Mankus3544% gamesnot enough data
Janney Carpenter + Annie Cordova3247% gamesnot enough data
Annie Cordova + Nancy Fridstein3254% gamesnot enough data
Joanie Mankus + Nancy Fridstein1439% gamesnot enough data
Annie Cordova + Trisha Barney044 matchesnot enough data
Janney Carpenter + Elizabeth Anderman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Hoskins
44W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Janney Carpenter
14W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Annie Cordova
40W–59L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Elizabeth Anderman
34W–55L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
Stephanie Chichester
35W–50L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.37
Nancy Fridstein
47W–77L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.29
Kathleen Nisbet
29W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Joanie Mankus
28W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trisha Barney
3W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.