Teams

VArne-CHTC

2025 Eno River Tri-Level-55 & Over · 55 & Over 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-20vs MLong-ENOWon 30
W#1 DoublesAdrianne Leinbach / Dayna Kelly vs Susie Post-Rust / Melinda Vigolo6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBeth Spinarski / Melissa Fitzpatrick vs Susan Alden / Donna Spero6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDina Golden / Sarah Ederle vs Stacy Brehm / Bracha Blanc6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-18vs NDraughon-YMCALost 12
L#1 DoublesAdrianne Leinbach / Kristin Lahey vs Susan Fanelly / Diane Werner5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Fitzpatrick / Celina Morice vs Nancy Draughon / Adrienne Todd3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDina Golden / Sarah Ederle vs Kit Carson / Leslie Jackson6-3, 6-1
2025-06-27vs NDraughon-YMCAWon 21
W#1 DoublesVicky Arne / Adrianne Leinbach vs Cindy Rosplock / Eleanor Hoover6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBeth Spinarski / Heidi Blankenship vs Lynda Noga / Mary Parker1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJoelle Permutt / Araya Coffey vs Brenda Pratt / Kit Carson6-4, 6-1
2025-06-20vs MLong-ENOWon 21
W#1 DoublesDayna Kelly / Torey Wahlstrom vs Susana Harvey / Susie Post-Rust6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCelina Morice / Regina Davis vs Susan Alden / Donna Spero4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDina Golden / Araya Coffey vs Stacy Brehm / Kristine Potter6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-17vs NDraughon-YMCALost 12
L#1 DoublesDayna Kelly / Kristin Lahey vs Diane Werner / Susan Fanelly5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCheryl Stevens / Celina Morice vs Adrienne Todd / Deb Lanier0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDina Golden / Sarah Ederle vs Kit Carson / Kellianne White6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-12vs MLong-ENOWon 20
W#1 DoublesTorey Wahlstrom / Dayna Kelly vs Susie Post-Rust / Lisa Montague6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDina Golden / Araya Coffey vs Susan Graff / Stacy Brehm5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-03vs NDraughon-YMCAWon 20
W#1 DoublesVicky Arne / Adrianne Leinbach vs Cindy Rosplock / Susan Fanelly7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDina Golden / Sarah Ederle vs Kit Carson / Brenda Pratt6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-20vs MLong-ENOWon 21
W#1 DoublesVicky Arne / Kristin Lahey vs Susana Harvey / Lisa Montague6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Blankenship / Beth Spinarski vs Caroline Patzer / Donna Spero3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDina Golden / Joelle Permutt vs Mary T Long / Anna Fadel3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Dayna Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Vicky Arne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Kristin Lahey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Adrianne Leinbach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Torey Wahlstrom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Melissa Fitzpatrick
published
3.39
Celina Morice
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Heidi Blankenship
published
3.35
Joelle Permutt
published
3.34
Cheryl Stevens
published 3.5
3.27
Beth Spinarski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Regina Davis
published
3.16
Sarah Ederle
published
3.13
Dina Golden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Araya Coffey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dayna Kelly + Vicky Arne19367% games+10.1% vs expected
Vicky Arne + Adrianne Leinbach151156% games+4.2% vs expected
Sarah Ederle + Dina Golden4447% games+1.4% vs expected
Kristin Lahey + Adrianne Leinbach192252% games+0.2% vs expected
Kristin Lahey + Vicky Arne10264% gamesnot enough data
Dina Golden + Araya Coffey6256% gamesnot enough data
Dayna Kelly + Adrianne Leinbach5255% gamesnot enough data
Vicky Arne + Torey Wahlstrom4263% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dayna Kelly
126W–99L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Vicky Arne
254W–150L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Kristin Lahey
190W–166L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Adrianne Leinbach
239W–223L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Torey Wahlstrom
97W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Melissa Fitzpatrick
39W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Celina Morice
92W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
Heidi Blankenship
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Joelle Permutt
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Cheryl Stevens
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Beth Spinarski
117W–82L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Regina Davis
27W–45L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Sarah Ederle
25W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3.5
Dina Golden
102W–68L career · 7 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Araya Coffey
84W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.