Teams

Maroon/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Early Start League-Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-18vs Madson/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 SinglesKristi Kelly vs Daria Sharova6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAmy Beno vs Samantha Reilly6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShelby Greene / Olga Jacobsen vs Dianne Garland / Aden Hardison1-6, 2-6
2024-09-30vs Protz/Kim/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesHailey Pierson / Shelby Greene vs Laurel Dortch / Kelly Kirby-Piovarcy0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Beno vs Ashwini Kashelikar6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Maroon / Rachel Loeffler vs Sherri Jones / Ryoko Yamanobe5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
EMILY MARTIN
published
2.90
Kristi Kelly
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.86
Tiffany King
published
2.78
Mary Morgan Holley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Christine Maroon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Hailey Pierson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Amy Beno
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.54
Olga Jacobsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Shelby Greene
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Orly Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Monique Raub
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Rachel Loeffler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Maroon + Orly Cohen4549% games+8.8% vs expected
Christine Maroon + Mary Morgan Holley404 matchesnot enough data
Mary Morgan Holley + Hailey Pierson404 matchesnot enough data
Orly Cohen + Mary Morgan Holley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

EMILY MARTIN
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
Kristi Kelly
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Tiffany King
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Mary Morgan Holley
14W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Christine Maroon
12W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Hailey Pierson
9W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Amy Beno
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Olga Jacobsen
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Shelby Greene
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
Orly Cohen
13W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Monique Raub
6W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Loeffler
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.