Teams

PHX/AbrahamSpeller/65Over/8.0W

2022 SPRING Adult 65 & Over - CAZ · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.93 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-04-20vs 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65SWon 30
W#1 DoublesSally Horn / Kerstin Speller vs Martha Mckeand / Mara Ferrari7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLynnette Carlson / Cathleen Reifsteck vs Roberta Snow / Katie Spivey6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDonna Morgan / Lynn Sanford vs Diana Cox / Chris Linderson6-3, 7-6
2022-04-13vs 8.0 ISP Peebles W65SWon 20
W#1 DoublesLynette Anderson / Kathy Redinger vs Patti Schollenberger / Nancy Paulson7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJan DeCosse / Donna Morgan vs Dinah Lee / Kay Wengert5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-06vs 8.0 STRC Bluml W65SLost 12
W#1 DoublesSheila Johnson / Carole Sharp vs Rona Clark / Nancy Wruck6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathy Abraham / Jill Gilford vs Sally Orr / Sandra Nielson4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKerstin Speller / Lynn Sanford vs Cindy Bluml / Christianne Ritchey7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-30vs 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65SWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarole Sharp / Cathleen Reifsteck vs Chris Linderson / Roberta Snow6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Fletcher / Kathy Abraham vs Iris Marks / Katie Spivey6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLynette Anderson / Lynnette Carlson vs Claytona Stockdale / Diana Cox6-0, 6-1
2022-03-23vs 8.0 ISP Peebles W65SWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Fletcher / Jan DeCosse vs Kim Chappelow-Lee / Dinah Lee6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDonna Morgan / Jill Gilford vs Kathleen Milligan / Kay Wengert6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Schmidt / Lynette Anderson vs Patti Schollenberger / Susan Eppers6-0, 6-1
2022-03-18vs 8.0 ISP Peebles W65SWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynnette Carlson / Lynette Anderson vs Dinah Lee / Ginette Echard6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathy Redinger / Donna Morgan vs Kay Wengert / Christine Frank6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEva Dahl / Chriss Hixon vs Kim Chappelow-Lee / SuLan Peebles6-1, 7-6
2022-03-09vs 8.0 STRC Bluml W65SWon 21
L#1 DoublesLynnette Carlson / Kathy Redinger vs Cindy Bluml / Christianne Ritchey4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSheila Johnson / Sally Horn vs Laura Rockowitz / Marilyn Gense6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEva Dahl / Chriss Hixon vs Mallory Jackson / Karen Owings-Yoder6-2, 6-4
2022-03-02vs 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65SWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarole Sharp / Sheila Johnson vs Iris Marks / Katie Spivey6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEva Dahl / Mary Schmidt vs Diana Cox / Chris Linderson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Abraham / Jill Gilford vs Roberta Snow / Claytona Stockdale6-2, 6-0
2022-02-16vs 8.0 STRC Bluml W65SWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Sanford / Mary Schmidt vs Sally Orr / Mary Kirkpatrick6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathy Abraham / Jan DeCosse vs Cindy Bluml / Christianne Ritchey6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSheila Johnson / Carole Sharp vs Judy Beran / Susan Olson6-0, 6-4
2022-02-09vs 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65SWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheila Johnson / Carole Sharp vs Mara Ferrari / Claytona Stockdale6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Abraham / Cathleen Reifsteck vs Iris Marks / Chris Linderson7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLynette Anderson / Jill Gilford vs Lisa Mercier / Karen Yore6-2, 6-3
2022-02-02vs 8.0 ISP Peebles W65SWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Redinger / Carole Sharp vs SuLan Peebles / Tami Scribner6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCathleen Reifsteck / Lynn Sanford vs Ginette Echard / Dinah Lee7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJill Gilford / Mary Schmidt vs Christine Frank / Patti Schollenberger6-0, 6-2
2022-01-26vs 8.0 STRC Bluml W65SWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Fletcher / Kathy Abraham vs Judy Beran / Nancy Wruck6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSheila Johnson / Carole Sharp vs Sally Orr / Susan Olson6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCathleen Reifsteck / Lynn Sanford vs Cindy Bluml / Christianne Ritchey2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/AbrahamSpeller/65Over/8.0W11130614212
28.0 STRC Bluml W65S75241226277
38.0 PTC Stockdale W65S66152145339
48.0 ISP Peebles W65S01233368425

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Chriss Hixon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Carole Sharp
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
Donna Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Jill Gilford
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Cathleen Reifsteck
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Jan DeCosse
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.30
Eva Dahl
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Kathy Abraham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Kathy Redinger
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kerstin Speller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Linda Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lynette Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Lynn Sanford
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Lynnette Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sally Horn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathleen Reifsteck + Lynnette Carlson8357% gamesnot enough data
Kerstin Speller + Kathy Abraham6260% gamesnot enough data
Mary Schmidt + Jill Gilford5156% gamesnot enough data
Carole Sharp + Kathy Redinger224 matchesnot enough data
Sally Horn + Lynette Anderson134 matchesnot enough data
Sally Horn + Kathy Abraham404 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Redinger + Lynnette Carlson224 matchesnot enough data
Cathleen Reifsteck + Mary Schmidt134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chriss Hixon
67W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.00
4
Carole Sharp
95W–47L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Donna Morgan
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jill Gilford
68W–42L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Cathleen Reifsteck
47W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
4
Jan DeCosse
31W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Eva Dahl
114W–92L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Kathy Abraham
86W–45L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Redinger
20W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kerstin Speller
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Fletcher
38W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynette Anderson
13W–6L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynn Sanford
49W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynnette Carlson
24W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Schmidt
46W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sally Horn
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.