Teams

OLYMPIC CW8.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 8.5

25 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Julia Lokey
published
4.25
Clare Badaracco
published 4.5
Brook Hartzell
published 4.5
4.16
Allison Watts
published 4.5
4.16
Caitlin Beatty
published 4.5
4.10
Victoria Watts
published
4.08
Carolina O'Haren
published 4.5
4.03
Valerie Pietrasz
published
4.01
Lisa Lohre
published
4.01
Jennifer Dibble
published
3.97
Katherine McCracken
published
3.86
Nora Bowers
published
3.80
3.76
3.73
Helen Zhang
published
3.56
Catherine Krabbenschmidt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Rita Williams
published
3.53
Tricia Weaver-Moss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Elizabeth Griffiths
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alyssa Lopes
published 3.5
Harriet Fryman
published
Julie Christy
published
Karen MacK
published
Kayla Emmerson
published
Nicole Wedlake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Lohre + Caitlin Beatty9653% games+1.3% vs expected
Julia Lokey + Schuyler Tilney-Volk224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Lokey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Clare Badaracco
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Brook Hartzell
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Allison Watts
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Caitlin Beatty
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
Victoria Watts
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Carolina O'Haren
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
Valerie Pietrasz
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
Lisa Lohre
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
Jennifer Dibble
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
4.01
Katherine McCracken
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
Nora Bowers
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
3.86
4
Catherine Fogelman
20W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
Schuyler Tilney-Volk
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.76
Helen Zhang
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.73
4
Catherine Krabbenschmidt
11W–11L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Rita Williams
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Tricia Weaver-Moss
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Elizabeth Griffiths
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Alyssa Lopes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Harriet Fryman
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Christy
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen MacK
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kayla Emmerson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Wedlake
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.