Teams

8.0 WIN/TER RiordanGuilmart W55F

2025 FALL Adult 55&Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.80 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-12-21vs 8.0 MVTC Kinney% W55FWon 21
W#1 DoublesVeronica Fuller / Shirine Faris vs Nobuko Tako / Sherrie Rook6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarta Gonzalez / Kathryn Just vs Ann Watts / Abby Irish7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCasidy Ward / Jamie Stockton vs Barbara Bloom / Jade LeWin5-7, 2-6
2024-12-14vs 8.0 ISP Sets In The City W55FWon 30
W#1 DoublesVeronica Fuller / Ginger Takeshita vs Suzanne Jocelyn Legg-Matthews / Denise Phillips6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLynn Sanford / Julie Walker vs Judy Jacobs / Pamela Buck6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJody Neuman / Jamie Stockton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-12-07vs 8.0 VDCR Harris W55FWon 21
W#1 DoublesShirine Faris / Veronica Fuller vs Judy Doseck / Becky Flander6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJulie Walker / Jamie Stockton vs Dawn Goslin / Rachel Baumgartner2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathryn Just / Danna Riordan vs Kim Warren / Andrea Davis6-3, 6-2
2024-11-23vs 8.0 GK Schneider W55FLost 12
W#1 DoublesDanna Riordan / Ginger Takeshita vs Lynne Dugan / Valerie Schneider6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJane Berkley / Jody Neuman vs Amy Rhoden / Sheila Wood3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCasidy Ward / Kathryn Just vs Linda Biddle / Chris Linderson5-7, 2-6
2024-11-16vs 8.0 PTC-Ferrari55 W55FLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanna Riordan / Ginger Takeshita vs Katherine Baker / Jane Clarke5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJody Neuman / Jane Berkley vs Carmen Walker / Becky Williams6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarta Gonzalez / Lili Cascino vs Mara Ferrari / SuLan Peebles5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-11-10vs 8.0 PTC PettyKinney W55FLost 12
W#1 DoublesDanna Riordan / Ginger Takeshita vs Jill Nelson / Shay Kos7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShirine Faris / Stephanie Clark vs Linda Myres / Louisa Wolowiecki6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLili Cascino / Jody Neuman vs Sally Alcott / Kim Dever2-6, 1-6
2024-11-02vs 8.0 ISP BannisterWilliams W55FLost 12
L#1 DoublesLili Cascino / Ginger Takeshita vs Martha Mckeand / Glynnis Gillespie4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJody Neuman / Stephanie Clark vs Carolee Williams / Brenda Francek6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVal Mutch / Jane Berkley vs Elizabeth Bannister / Linda Lessor6-7, 2-6
2024-10-26vs FALL 8.0 TRI Trilogy W55FSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMarta Gonzalez / Julie Walker vs Ruth Ostenso / Susan Nachtigall0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVeronica Fuller / Danna Riordan vs Kathy Dutridge / Christina Harrison6-3, 6-4
2024-10-19vs 8.0 SRP JohnsonQuinn W55FWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Clark / Ginger Takeshita vs Jessica Navarro / Debbie Sinagoga0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesVeronica Fuller / Danna Riordan vs Kelley Quinn / Stacie White6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarta Gonzalez / Julie Walker vs Jody Bafus / Tammy Anderson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-12vs 8.0 DCRCC 55 LOVE W55FLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Clark / Lynn Sanford vs Tracey Gray / Carolyn Gladwell3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCasidy Ward / Jane Berkley vs Jill Aafedt / Andrea Kester1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Guilmart / Val Mutch vs Linda Hannen / Michelle Snyder5-7, 3-6
2024-10-05vs 8.0 CTC BowlesDeliso-O'Brian W55FWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephanie Clark / Veronica Fuller vs Cathy O'Brien / Carla Sulka7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarta Gonzalez / Julie Walker vs Joy Bowles / Cindy Guillaume6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDanna Riordan / Lynn Sanford vs Rhonda Bies / Gabrielle Blawn6-2, 7-5
2024-09-21vs 8.0 ACC FonsecaCrannell W55FLost 03
L#1 DoublesLili Cascino / Ginger Takeshita vs Sherri Finnegan / Elaine Solomon4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Guilmart / Val Mutch vs Susanne Hogan / Brenda Cook0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMarta Gonzalez / Jane Berkley vs Anne Maxwell / Donna Pace2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FALL 8.0 TRI Trilogy W55F10230618238
28.0 SRP JohnsonQuinn W55F10227921243
38.0 PTC-Ferrari55 W55F102261029288
48.0 PTC PettyKinney W55F9327926277
58.0 ACC FonsecaCrannell W55F84221433303
68.0 VDCR Harris W55F66181842333
78.0 GK Schneider W55F66171943319
88.0 WIN/TER RiordanGuilmart W55F57162045342
98.0 DCRCC 55 LOVE W55F57152147377
108.0 ISP BannisterWilliams W55F48122452391
118.0 ISP Sets In The City W55F21092758381
128.0 MVTC Kinney% W55F21092758396
138.0 CTC BowlesDeliso-O'Brian W55F11163062401

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Shirine Faris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Ginger Takeshita
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Danna Riordan
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.45
Jody Neuman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Jamie Stockton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Casidy Ward
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jane Berkley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kathryn Just
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Guilmart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lili Cascino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lynn Sanford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marta Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Stephanie Clark
published
Susan Hanson
published
Val Mutch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Veronica Fuller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Fuller + Stephanie Clark7361% gamesnot enough data
Danna Riordan + Veronica Fuller5457% gamesnot enough data
Danna Riordan + Lynn Sanford5158% gamesnot enough data
Shirine Faris + Veronica Fuller6062% gamesnot enough data
Danna Riordan + Ginger Takeshita4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shirine Faris
103W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Ginger Takeshita
37W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Danna Riordan
39W–34L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Jody Neuman
51W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Jamie Stockton
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Casidy Ward
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jane Berkley
12W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathryn Just
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Guilmart
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lili Cascino
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Sanford
49W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marta Gonzalez
34W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Clark
42W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Hanson
29W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Val Mutch
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Veronica Fuller
90W–39L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.