Teams

GEPTA-4.5-Adult/M(Brown)(EPTC#2)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 4.33 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings4 teams · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-4.5-Adult/M(DelaFuente)(EPTC#3)90341131300
2GEPTA-4.5-Adult/M(Uraga)(EPTC#4)63261947421
3GEPTA-4.5-Adult/M(Gandarilla)(EPTC#1)36172864485
4GEPTA-4.5-Adult/M(Brown)(EPTC#2)09133267469

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emmanuel Quintana
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
4.12
Anthony Haddad
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 4.5
4.11
Don Davie
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.91
Andy Boettjer
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published 4.5
3.86
Christopher Baryla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Austin Allen
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 4
Jason Jackiewicz
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
John Pfirman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jorge Chavez
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
Marc Escareno
published
Michael Kotowski
usually #1 Doubles 51%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Nathan Brown
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Navin Navidomskis
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Omar Mendoza
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rene Hernando
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Timothy Cantrell
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Kotowski + Nathan Brown31665% games+3.9% vs expected
Anthony Haddad + Don Davie5950% games+2.5% vs expected
Timothy Cantrell + Andy Boettjer5751% games−10.7% vs expected
Anthony Haddad + Michael Kotowski7257% gamesnot enough data
Rene Hernando + Andy Boettjer213 matchesnot enough data
Austin Allen + Nathan Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emmanuel Quintana
6W–14L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Anthony Haddad
57W–43L career · 20 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Don Davie
23W–32L career · 14 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
Andy Boettjer
50W–63L career · 17 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
3.91
4
Christopher Baryla
71W–45L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Austin Allen
152W–47L career · 34 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Jason Jackiewicz
23W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Pfirman
39W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jorge Chavez
65W–35L career · 25 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marc Escareno
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Kotowski
130W–48L career · 41 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nathan Brown
59W–32L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Navin Navidomskis
4W–16L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Omar Mendoza
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rene Hernando
27W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Cantrell
43W–59L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.