Teams

GEPTA-4.5-Adult/M(DelaFuente)(EPTC#3)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings4 teams · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-4.5-Adult/M(DelaFuente)(EPTC#3)90341131300
2GEPTA-4.5-Adult/M(Uraga)(EPTC#4)63261947421
3GEPTA-4.5-Adult/M(Gandarilla)(EPTC#1)36172864485
4GEPTA-4.5-Adult/M(Brown)(EPTC#2)09133267469

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Ian Sparkman
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
4.28
Alex Anoveros
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published 4.5
Creighton Jones
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published 4.5
4.21
Adrian Guevara
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Carlos Fraire
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4.5
Jacob Maese
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Jaime Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jose Estrada
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Jose Maese
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Juan Hobbs
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Mateo Cisneros
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Bezemek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Rene Archuleta
usually #2 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Tony Magana
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Ulrich Delafuente
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Maese + Jose Maese9453% games+9.3% vs expected
Creighton Jones + Ulrich Delafuente17261% games+1.0% vs expected
Michael Bezemek + Ulrich Delafuente2643% games−9.6% vs expected
Adrian Guevara + Tony Magana3450% gamesnot enough data
Alex Anoveros + Tony Magana314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Bezemek + Creighton Jones314 matchesnot enough data
Carlos Fraire + Tony Magana044 matchesnot enough data
Jose Estrada + Adrian Guevara303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ian Sparkman
13W–13L career · 7 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.38
4.5
Alex Anoveros
42W–43L career · 18 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Creighton Jones
29W–7L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Adrian Guevara
51W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Carlos Fraire
39W–58L career · 7 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.09
Jacob Maese
48W–40L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jaime Herrera
22W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jose Estrada
27W–18L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jose Maese
46W–64L career · 16 lines in 2024
not enough data
Juan Hobbs
27W–4L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mateo Cisneros
43W–14L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Bezemek
96W–84L career · 38 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rene Archuleta
54W–23L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tony Magana
87W–41L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ulrich Delafuente
61W–25L career · 21 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.