Teams

BROADSTONE RC 55AW6.0A

2024 ADULT 55&Over · Women 6.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Karin Shelton
published
3.45
Lori Reading-Foster
published
3.16
Jennefer Asperheim
published
3.11
Gladys Cornell
published 3.5
3.11
Jeannine Neves
published
3.04
Kristina Houston
published
3.01
Duffy Kelly
published 3
2.87
Andrea Shaw
published 3
2.87
Ann Gattuso
published 3
2.82
Janet Souza
published
2.73
Roxanne Morgan
published
2.70
Antonette Clark
published 3
2.36
Lisa Reese
published
2.10
Xiaoling Li
published
1.95
Nancy Bothwell
published
Theresa Lo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Shaw + Janet Souza4152% gamesnot enough data
Roxanne Morgan + Kristina Houston2352% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Reese + Lori Reading-Foster213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karin Shelton
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
Lori Reading-Foster
18W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Jennefer Asperheim
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.16
3.5
Gladys Cornell
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.11
Jeannine Neves
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.11
Kristina Houston
18W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.04
3
Duffy Kelly
15W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Andrea Shaw
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Ann Gattuso
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.87
Janet Souza
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
Roxanne Morgan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Antonette Clark
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Lisa Reese
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%85%15%
2.36
Xiaoling Li
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Nancy Bothwell
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Theresa Lo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.