Teams

Jedlicka/LR/LRRC

2025 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-31vs Junior/LR/RebWon 21
L#1 SinglesStephanie Pinter vs CARMEN RICE2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesCourtney Newell vs Valerie Hunt4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBrooke Smith vs Brittany Richardson Watson6-1, 6-2
2025-12-16vs Junior/LR/RebWon 20
W#1 SinglesCourtney Newell vs Whitney Cathcart6-3, 6-5
W#2 SinglesTiffani Jedlicka vs CARMEN RICE6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2025-12-14vs Donahue/LR/RebsWon 21
W#1 SinglesTiffani Jedlicka vs Sydney Breaker6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesHannah Heffernan vs Shiloah Kviatkovsky4-6, 3-4
W#3 SinglesColleen Youngdahl vs Kara Oko5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-12-09vs DGarretson/MH/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesStephanie Pinter vs Carmen Scruggs6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTiffani Jedlicka vs Emily Gates6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesColleen Youngdahl vs Ana Bridges6-3, 6-6
2025-12-05vs DGarretson/MH/BPWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrooke Smith vs Carmen Scruggs6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCourtney Newell vs Megan Longing6-3, 3-6
2025-12-05vs Donahue/LR/RebsLost 12
L#1 SinglesTiffani Jedlicka vs Kelsy Knox3-6, 4-4
W#2 SinglesCourtney Newell vs Shiloah Kviatkovsky6-3, 6-7
L#3 SinglesHannah Heffernan vs Kara Oko4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Colleen Youngdahl
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.85
Courtney Newell
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.79
Hannah Heffernan
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.73
Tiffani Jedlicka
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.43
Brooke Smith
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Stephanie Pinter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Newell + Tiffani Jedlicka3447% games−2.3% vs expected
Brooke Smith + Tiffani Jedlicka404 matchesnot enough data
Colleen Youngdahl + Tiffani Jedlicka303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colleen Youngdahl
50W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Courtney Newell
34W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Hannah Heffernan
22W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
Tiffani Jedlicka
82W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Brooke Smith
52W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.43
Stephanie Pinter
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.