Teams

Ma.Wood40S

2024 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-28vs Jo.Hulicki40SLost 01
L#1 SinglesTed Lotchin vs Aaron Earwood6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-07-21vs To.Blevins40SLost 01
L#2 SinglesBrent Lamm vs Douglas Marks7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-14vs Br.Ross40SLost 01
L#2 SinglesTed Lotchin vs Brent Townsend4-6, 4-6
2024-06-23vs To.Blevins40SLost 01
L#2 SinglesBrent Lamm vs Ryan Busey4-6, 5-7
2024-06-15Lost 01
L#1 SinglesTed Lotchin vs David Roberts1-6, 2-6
2024-06-09vs Jo.Hulicki40SWon 10
W#3 SinglesTed Lotchin vs Stephen Cole6-2, 6-2
2024-05-19vs Br.Ross40SWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrent Lamm vs Luo Xiao4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Ted Lotchin
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.40
Samir Naik
published
3.37
Mark Wood
published
3.30
Brent Lamm
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Jeff Keisner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ted Lotchin + Brent Lamm6453% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ted Lotchin
159W–115L career · 4 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Samir Naik
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
3.40
Mark Wood
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Brent Lamm
154W–106L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Jeff Keisner
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.