Teams

Park City MARC-Jacobs/Jordan

2023 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 2.5W

6 players · average NTRP 2.88 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-16vs Red Ledges-SmithSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKarla Hickman / Jennifer Williams vs Jennifer Christ / Sharilee Hill6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBethany Jordan / Sheri Jacobs vs Rena Bucad / Suly Cates4-6, 3-6
2023-10-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesKarla Hickman / Lori Pfeiffer vs Lori Carter / Alison Barber7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-02vs Sunpro-AllenWon 10
W#1 DoublesKarla Hickman / Lori Pfeiffer vs Emily Chambers / Megumi Matsuzawa6-1, 6-1
2023-09-25vs Ivory Ridge-TurnerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLori Pfeiffer / Karla Hickman vs Risa Karras / Christy Denney6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBethany Jordan / Nina Leonard vs Shalee Turner / Carolyn Zhang4-6, 4-6
2023-09-11vs Ivory Ridge-TaylorSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKarla Hickman / Lori Pfeiffer vs Becky Fajardo / Ashley Taylor7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBethany Jordan / Nina Leonard vs Deborah DeBoer / Megan Mullins2-6, 1-6
2023-08-21vs Sunpro-HillLost 01
L#2 DoublesShruthi Kinkead / Karla Hickman vs Andrea Cook / Elizabeth Thayer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Lori Pfeiffer
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
2.63
Shruthi Kinkead
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.28
Marianne Miceli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Bethany Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Karla Hickman
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Sheri Jacobs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Pfeiffer + Karla Hickman12167% games+18.8% vs expected
Shruthi Kinkead + Sheri Jacobs3546% games−7.7% vs expected
Marianne Miceli + Sheri Jacobs2539% gamesnot enough data
Bethany Jordan + Marianne Miceli134 matchesnot enough data
Bethany Jordan + Sheri Jacobs314 matchesnot enough data
Shruthi Kinkead + Marianne Miceli123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lori Pfeiffer
81W–43L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Shruthi Kinkead
45W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.63
2.5
Marianne Miceli
17W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.28
2.5
Bethany Jordan
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karla Hickman
14W–10L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheri Jacobs
9W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.