Teams

Ivory Ridge-Turner

2023 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 2.5W

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-09vs Sports Mall-NelsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarla Sleight / Carolyn Zhang vs Kiely Hanks / Sarah Gardner6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesShalee Turner vs Megan Moore6-3, 6-2
2023-10-02vs Ivory Ridge-TaylorWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarla Sleight / Jena Rowley vs Paulette Santiago / Becky Fajardo6-3, 6-3
2023-09-25vs Park City MARC-Jacobs/JordanWon 10
W#2 DoublesShalee Turner / Carolyn Zhang vs Bethany Jordan / Nina Leonard6-4, 6-4
2023-09-18vs Sunpro-HillWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Taylor / Carolyn Zhang vs Debbie Dunn / Lee Ann Hobbs6-0, 6-4
2023-09-11vs Liberty Park Tennis-Massey/BaucomWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Bean / Shalee Turner vs Erin Massey / MacY Bell5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJena Rowley vs Holly Christensen7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristy Denney / Carolyn Zhang vs Gretchen Pettey / Niki Evans6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-28vs Park City MARC-White/LlewellynWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarla Sleight vs Margaret Bloomer6-1, 6-4
2023-08-21vs Sports Mall-WoodLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristy Denney / Jena Rowley vs Tori Locke / Jessica Eckert5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Zhang vs Holli Allred5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesShalee Turner / Carla Sleight vs Lisa Cloward / Lindsey Pizza6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Jena Rowley
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.96
Carla Sleight
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Megan Bean
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.74
Risa Karras
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.60
Christy Denney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Carolyn Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Shalee Turner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jena Rowley + Megan Bean5165% games+16.2% vs expected
Risa Karras + Christy Denney6645% games−6.8% vs expected
Shalee Turner + Carla Sleight314 matchesnot enough data
Shalee Turner + Megan Bean303 matchesnot enough data
Jena Rowley + Carla Sleight303 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Zhang + Christy Denney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jena Rowley
30W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Carla Sleight
24W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Megan Bean
51W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Risa Karras
49W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Christy Denney
50W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
2.5
Carolyn Zhang
7W–13L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Shalee Turner
22W–2L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.