Teams

MEA BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs RMTC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian MacMillan / Andrew Schifle vs Joshua Harrison / Matthew Palmer3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPatrick Sprowls vs Horatio Nelson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-07-13vs TTA-E REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Schifle / Donnie Martin vs Jose Amador / Eric Stromberg7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPatrick Sprowls / James Bray vs Philip Dixon-Patterson / Ian Harris1-6, 6-7
2023-07-06vs NJ PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrew Schifle / Matt Schwartz vs Hank Fisher / Tomas Mendez7-5, 6-3
2023-06-29vs LTA-Q ORANGEWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatrick Sprowls / Andrew Smith vs Jim Wilson / Idi Omar6-2, 7-5
2023-06-22vs MEA GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCurt Corrigan / Andrew Schifle vs Josh Kahn / Xinlin Li6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPatrick Sprowls / Brad Michalchuk vs Erik Houseman / Steve Bennett2-6, 3-6
2023-06-15vs RMTC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Schifle / Patrick Sprowls vs Scott Gorrell / Alex Pedersen6-4, 6-4
2023-06-08vs TTA-E REDLost 01
L#1 SinglesPatrick Sprowls vs Steven Alvarado6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Andrew Schifle
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.41
James Bray
published
Curt Corrigan
published 4.5
4.13
Peter Walters
published
4.12
Brian MacMillan
published 4.5
4.10
Donnie Martin
published
4.08
Matt Schwartz
published
3.89
Patrick Sprowls
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Mark Buzek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Walters + Donnie Martin2349% gamesnot enough data
Peter Walters + Brian MacMillan134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Buzek + Curt Corrigan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Schifle
37W–10L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
4.42
James Bray
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
4.41
4.5
Curt Corrigan
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Walters
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Brian MacMillan
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.12
Donnie Martin
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.10
Matt Schwartz
5W–18L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Patrick Sprowls
75W–63L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.89
Mark Buzek
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.