Teams

LTA-Q ORANGE

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-20vs NJ PURPLESplit 11
L#2 DoublesMark Hinman / Jim Wilson vs Tomas Mendez / Christopher Johnstone2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesIdi Omar / Judson Smith vs Scott Steputis / John Keefe6-4, 6-1
2023-07-13vs RMTC REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesWayne Sidney / Idi Omar vs Rich Weintraub / Rustin Necessary6-7, 4-6
2023-07-12vs TTA-E REDLost 01
L#3 DoublesIdi Omar / Jim Wilson vs Ryan Schellpeper / Eric Jaggers1-6, 5-7
2023-07-06vs MEA GREENLost 01
L#3 DoublesIdi Omar / Jim Wilson vs Steve Sims / Theo Mandel6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-06-29vs MEA BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesJim Wilson / Idi Omar vs Patrick Sprowls / Andrew Smith2-6, 5-7
2023-06-15vs NJ PURPLELost 01
L#1 SinglesMark Hinman vs Blair Watkins2-6, 0-6
2023-06-08vs RMTC REDWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Wilson / Idi Omar vs Seth Chernoff / Paul Kolachov7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
AJ Johnson
published 4.5
David Riffel
published 4.5
4.21
Clayton McLaughlin
published 4.5
4.10
Mark Hinman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Wayne Sidney
published
4.03
Marco Scalise
published
3.99
Jim Wilson
published
3.83
Idi Omar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Judson Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Hinman + Idi Omar0525% gamesnot enough data
Judson Smith + Idi Omar044 matchesnot enough data
Clayton McLaughlin + Jim Wilson134 matchesnot enough data
Marco Scalise + David Riffel044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
AJ Johnson
21W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
4.42
4.5
David Riffel
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Clayton McLaughlin
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Mark Hinman
26W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
Wayne Sidney
6W–24L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.09
Marco Scalise
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
Jim Wilson
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Idi Omar
52W–74L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
Judson Smith
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.