Teams

TIC Sutton @ Teays Valley

2024 OH OV WINTER · SPRING A18&O

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-01vs TIC Ritchie @ Teays ValleyLost 01
L#2 SinglesRoger Cooke vs Jaymes Haggerty1-6, 1-6
2024-06-24vs TIC Ritchie @ Teays ValleyLost 02
L#1 SinglesRoger Cooke vs Jaymes Haggerty0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesShane Hutton vs Christopher Ritchie6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-04vs TIC Ritchie @ Teays ValleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesBernard Lehosit / Joshua Lawson vs Noah Fulks / James Mcintosh2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SPRING A18&O have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Shane Hutton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.14
Tyler Strong
published
3.85
Brian Delcotto
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 4.5
George Barker
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Clark Campbell
published 4
3.50
Matthew Sutton
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Bernard Lehosit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joshua Lawson
published
Roger Cooke
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Barker + Matthew Sutton5453% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Sutton + Brian Delcotto044 matchesnot enough data
Shane Hutton + Tyler Strong213 matchesnot enough data
Roger Cooke + Matthew Sutton123 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Sutton + Joshua Lawson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shane Hutton
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
4.27
Tyler Strong
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Brian Delcotto
33W–19L career · 7 lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.85
4
George Barker
22W–10L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Clark Campbell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Matthew Sutton
71W–32L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Bernard Lehosit
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Joshua Lawson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Roger Cooke
6W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.