Teams

TIC Ritchie @ Teays Valley

2024 OH OV WINTER · SPRING A18&O

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-01vs TIC Sutton @ Teays ValleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Ritchie / Ryan Mullins vs Matthew Sutton / George Barker6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesThomas McIntosh vs Brian Delcotto6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJaymes Haggerty vs Roger Cooke6-1, 6-1
2024-06-24vs TIC Sutton @ Teays ValleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Bowman / Reid Bailey vs Matthew Sutton / Brian Delcotto6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJaymes Haggerty vs Roger Cooke6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesChristopher Ritchie vs Shane Hutton4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-04vs TIC Sutton @ Teays ValleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesNoah Fulks / James Mcintosh vs Bernard Lehosit / Joshua Lawson6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRyon Zent / Scott Zent vs Matthew Sutton / George Barker1-0
2024-05-10Won 30
W#1 DoublesJason Prince / James Mcintosh vs Brian Delcotto / Joshua Lawson6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesChristopher Ritchie vs Matthew Sutton6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNoah Fulks vs George Barker6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SPRING A18&O have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Christopher Ritchie
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Jaymes Haggerty
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.00
Noah Fulks
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
James Mcintosh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Prince
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Reid Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Mullins
published
Ryon Zent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Zent
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas McIntosh
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryon Zent + Scott Zent303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christopher Ritchie
18W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
4.38
Jaymes Haggerty
15W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.05
Noah Fulks
26W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
4.00
James Mcintosh
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jason Prince
22W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
John Bowman
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Reid Bailey
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Mullins
11W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryon Zent
13W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Scott Zent
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Thomas McIntosh
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.