Teams

KAllen (Raintree)

2022 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-26vs LDiFazio (Queens)Won 10
W#1 SinglesKatrina Richards vs Carolyn Ludwin6-3, 6-0
2022-07-19Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRona Karacaova vs Caroline Cox2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-12vs DGier (Queens)Won 10
W#2 SinglesKatrina Richards vs Lauren Spanos6-1, 6-1
2022-07-05vs EKennard/BDavis (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKatrina Richards vs Laura Grant4-6, 2-6
2022-06-28vs KCronin/AFink (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#3 SinglesRona Karacaova vs Kathy Harborne6-2, 6-2
2022-06-21vs BBaker (Queens)Won 20
W#2 SinglesKatrina Richards vs Brittany Baker6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesRona Karacaova vs Anna Sison6-1, 6-3
2022-06-14Won 10
W#2 SinglesKatrina Richards vs Heather Zabinsky6-2, 6-2
2022-06-07vs LDiFazio (Queens)Split 11
W#1 SinglesMegan Hua Shaul vs Marcia Merritt7-6, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRona Karacaova vs Lori DiFazio6-7, 6-7
2022-05-31vs SKopf (Raintree)Lost 01
L#3 SinglesKatrina Richards vs Katie Eggers4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Katrina Richards
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Megan Hua Shaul
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Erin Moser
published 3.5
2.93
Rona Karacaova
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.82
Denise Dexter
published 3
2.38
Katherine Reeves
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Hua Shaul + Katrina Richards5069% gamesnot enough data
Erin Moser + Katrina Richards314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katrina Richards
152W–79L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Megan Hua Shaul
57W–47L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Erin Moser
22W–16L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Rona Karacaova
51W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Denise Dexter
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Katherine Reeves
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
0%82%18%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.