Teams

Watson - Topeka

2021 KS 18 & Over Adult Outdoor League · 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-07-26vs KS/Unrein/18&Over4.5MLost 04
L#1 DoublesTim Swope / Jimmy Watson vs Ian Clifton / Dustin Wiens1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChris Boiteau / Kurt Reid vs Robert Mansfield / Shivraj Patil4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesScott Bagwell vs Gil Trout0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTrung Bui / Jamie Robinson vs Long Pham / Ben McCouch2-6, 2-6
2021-07-17vs KS/Unrein/18&Over4.5MLost 14
L#1 DoublesKurt Reid / Jamie Robinson vs Chad Unrein / Dustin Wiens3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJimmy Watson vs Shivraj Patil2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCory Clutter / Tim Swope vs Ian Clifton / Mitchel Whitmer1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesScott Bagwell vs Gil Trout6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChris Boiteau / Trung Bui vs Ben McCouch / Long Pham1-6, 1-6
2021-07-17vs KS/Unrein/18&Over4.5MLost 05
L#1 DoublesKurt Reid / Trung Bui vs Shivraj Patil / Dustin Wiens2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTim Swope vs Mitchel Whitmer2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChris Boiteau / Jimmy Watson vs Ian Clifton / Robert Mansfield2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesScott Bagwell vs Gil Trout2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCory Clutter / Jamie Robinson vs Ben McCouch / Long Pham1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KS/Unrein/18&Over4.5M30141265
2Watson - Topeka0311428173

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Kenneth Blair
published
Chris Boiteau
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jamie Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Scott Bagwell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Jimmy Watson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kurt Reid
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tim Swope
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Swope + Jimmy Watson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenneth Blair
51W–27L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Chris Boiteau
51W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Jamie Robinson
8W–18L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott Bagwell
50W–97L career · 3 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.61
Jimmy Watson
43W–30L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kurt Reid
28W–19L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tim Swope
36W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.