Teams

Crooke - RS Clay

2022 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-12vs Escambia - Gonzalez - SHLLost 01
L#2 DoublesRenee Bradford / Angela Stewart vs Arlene Doyle / Whitney Sumrall1-6, 2-6
2022-10-05Won 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Nitterauer / Jami Steinmetz vs Charlotte Stark / Tracy Ezelle6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRenee Bradford / Angela Stewart vs Tammy Crump / Laurin Halstead0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Scott / Bonita Witkin vs Ive Marsach / Amelia Gandy6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-22vs Escambia - Gonzalez - SHLLost 12
W#1 DoublesLauren Haack / Susan Nitterauer vs Lori Gonzalez / Carel Demanss6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRenee Bradford / Angela Stewart vs Denise Lebert / Whitney Sumrall3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Anderson / Bonita Witkin vs Shannon Schluter / Mikaela McManus1-6, 1-6
2022-09-07vs Antal - RS ClayWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Nitterauer / Lauren Haack vs Rachel Trahan / Melissa Paravalos6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCarly Russell / Renee Bradford vs Shellie McCall / Tara McCarthy1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBonita Witkin / Lauren Anderson vs Thuy Nguyen / Tiffany Jones6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Jami Steinmetz
published 4.5
4.17
Lauren Haack
published
3.98
3.97
Susan Nitterauer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Renee Bradford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Carly Russell
published 4
3.62
Bonita Witkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Angela Stewart
published 4
3.44
Jena Wise
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Anna Kreis
published 3.5
Ann Scott
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Nitterauer + Renee Bradford11357% gamesnot enough data
Bonita Witkin + Susan Nitterauer2441% gamesnot enough data
Bonita Witkin + Renee Bradford134 matchesnot enough data
Jena Wise + Susan Nitterauer033 matchesnot enough data
Jena Wise + Renee Bradford033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jami Steinmetz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
Lauren Haack
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
Shaner Garner Crooke
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
Susan Nitterauer
149W–130L career · 3 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
Renee Bradford
134W–163L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Carly Russell
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Bonita Witkin
55W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Angela Stewart
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Jena Wise
38W–96L career · 4 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Anna Kreis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Ann Scott
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.