Teams

SKY BLUE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-04vs HV NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Bacon / Paul Krueger vs Scott Cohen / Jamie Kennedy7-6, 6-3
2024-08-28vs RRTC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Bacon / Paul Krueger vs Alan Gillespie / Sean Hudelson4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Raval vs David Arons3-6, 2-6
2024-08-21vs CACM REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesGregory Tamkin / Paul Krueger vs Randal Ankeney / Jimmie Rose6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeremy Thomas / Jeffrey Raval vs Justin Jelinek / Philip Talley6-3, 7-5
2024-08-14vs SKY REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeremy Thomas / Jeffrey Raval vs Kevin Breault / Chad Murray2-6, 3-6
2024-08-07vs KC-CC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesCoupar Lester / Paul Krueger vs Bryan Scott Martin / Mark Beelaert2-6, 2-6
2024-07-31vs HW REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesMatt Moon / Jeffrey Raval vs John Miller / Andy Silverman6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-07-24vs HRCA-S YELLOWLost 01
L#1 SinglesPaul Krueger vs Ryan Griffin3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Ned Rule
published
3.69
Paul Krueger
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.65
Gregory Tamkin
published
3.64
Jeremy Thomas
published
3.57
David Bacon
published 4
3.56
Coupar Lester
published 4
3.42
Jeffrey Raval
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Matt Moon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Moon + Coupar Lester134 matchesnot enough data
Paul Krueger + Ned Rule033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ned Rule
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Paul Krueger
50W–50L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Gregory Tamkin
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.65
Jeremy Thomas
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.64
4
David Bacon
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.57
4
Coupar Lester
12W–27L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Jeffrey Raval
89W–70L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
Matt Moon
5W–20L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.