Teams

CACM RED

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-28vs KC-CC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesRandal Ankeney / Michael Nobles vs Mark Beelaert / Tim Day3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJustin Jelinek / Jeff Kinzler vs Jeremy Yeiter / Raymond Kinch2-6, 3-6
2024-08-21vs SKY BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesRandal Ankeney / Jimmie Rose vs Gregory Tamkin / Paul Krueger4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Nobles vs Coupar Lester6-0, 6-0
2024-08-14vs HRCA-S YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesJimmie Rose / Philip Talley vs Ryan Griffin / Rohit Dass1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Nobles vs Marshall Nichols6-7, 2-6
2024-08-07vs HV NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesJustin Jelinek / Jimmie Rose vs Peter Sjoberg / Michael Walker6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Nobles / James Parker vs Scott Cohen / Reed Upson5-7, 3-6
2024-07-31vs RRTC BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Nobles / James Parker vs Sean Raftery / Alan Gillespie6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-24vs HW REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Nobles / Jimmie Rose vs Glenn Tacke / Michael Gleason3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJustin Jelinek / Jeff Kinzler vs Richard Miranda / John Miller6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Randal Ankeney
published
3.71
Michael Nobles
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.63
Jimmie Rose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Jason Wang
published
3.30
Jeff Kinzler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Justin Jelinek
published
Philip Talley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jimmie Rose + Randal Ankeney4358% games+8.3% vs expected
Jeff Kinzler + Justin Jelinek3444% games−13.7% vs expected
Jason Wang + Michael Nobles213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Randal Ankeney
18W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Michael Nobles
67W–78L career · 6 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Jimmie Rose
100W–94L career · 4 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.63
Jason Wang
14W–22L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.61
3.5
Jeff Kinzler
37W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Justin Jelinek
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Philip Talley
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.