Teams

Benoit/55/3.5/WD/REDS

2026 LAF Adult 55 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 LAF (55&O) Women - Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-13vs Fontenot/55/3.5/WD/OCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Conner / Suzie Hardy vs Patricia Lanier / Alice Landry4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudy Edington / Ginger Guillory vs Melissa Gauthier / Patricia Como6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Pratt / Christine Albarado vs Michelle Mixon / Amy Abshire1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-06vs Lebouef/55/3.5/WD/REDSLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusie Bertrand / Marie Dugas vs Kristina Suire / Susan Hardy2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMisook Kim / Allison Peace vs Kathleen Gidman / Becky Pye0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatricia Brunet / Christine Albarado vs Lisa Sudduth / Paula Cradeur4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-02-27vs Disotell/55/3.5/WD/BEVRLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Conner / Allison Peace vs Liz Caillier / Rochelle Disotell6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSuzie Hardy / Susie Bertrand vs Wendy Steele / Glenda Tucker5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesToni Benoit / Sandra Huguet vs Andrea Simon / Brenda Leger2-6, 1-6
2026-02-20vs Broussard/55/3.5/WD/YSCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllison Peace / Patricia Brunet vs Wiggy Broussard / Bridgette Greer0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Delcambre / Suzie Hardy vs Michelle Lafleur / Cynthia Joubert2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesPaula Pratt / Marie Dugas vs Aileen Prevost / Mary Orgeron6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-02-13vs Pearson/55/3.5/WD/REDSLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Conner / Allison Peace vs Cindy Mouton / Lisa Greenwood4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusie Bertrand / Sandra Huguet vs Rene Pearson / Dailene Melancon1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Dugas / Susan Delcambre vs Kathryn Bordlee / Staci Overton1-6, 4-6
2026-02-06vs Domingue/55/3.5/WD/REDSLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatricia Brunet / Ginger Guillory vs Patti Domingue / Paige Laperouse5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Conner / Susie Bertrand vs Tammy Broussard / Angela Hebert6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJudy Edington / Misook Kim vs Angela Cagle / Julie Pilgrim6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-01-30vs Hampton/55/3.5/WD/OCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllison Peace / Paula Pratt vs Mary Schutte / Tammy Vosburg4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesToni Benoit / Susie Bertrand vs Mickie Ainsworth / Tisha Guillory4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Conner / Sandra Huguet vs Fran Hampton / Lauren Brown6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 LAF (55&O) Women - Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Domingue/55/3.5/WD/REDS7020110143
2Pearson/55/3.5/WD/REDS6117411130
3Disotell/55/3.5/WD/BEVR5216514160
4Broussard/55/3.5/WD/YSC43101122185
5Lebouef/55/3.5/WD/REDS3491230208
6Hampton/55/3.5/WD/OCC2551632217
7Fontenot/55/3.5/WD/OCC1631838239
8Benoit/55/3.5/WD/REDS0741737230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Allison Peace
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Julie Conner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.30
Marie Dugas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Christine Albarado
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Paula Pratt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Suzie Hardy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Susie Bertrand
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.01
Patricia Brunet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Judy Edington
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Sandra Huguet
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Ginger Guillory
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Misook Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Delcambre
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Toni Benoit
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzie Hardy + Paula Pratt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Peace
19W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Julie Conner
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
Marie Dugas
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Christine Albarado
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paula Pratt
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Suzie Hardy
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08
Susie Bertrand
3W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Patricia Brunet
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
Judy Edington
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Sandra Huguet
12W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Ginger Guillory
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Misook Kim
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Delcambre
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Toni Benoit
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.