Teams

Lebouef/55/3.5/WD/REDS

2026 LAF Adult 55 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 LAF (55&O) Women - Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-13vs Hampton/55/3.5/WD/OCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Sudduth / Sandra Lebouef vs Mickie Ainsworth / Tisha Guillory2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnnette Arton / Katie Vincent vs Fran Hampton / Colleen Taulbee6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-06vs Benoit/55/3.5/WD/REDSWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristina Suire / Susan Hardy vs Susie Bertrand / Marie Dugas6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Gidman / Becky Pye vs Misook Kim / Allison Peace6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Sudduth / Paula Cradeur vs Patricia Brunet / Christine Albarado6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-02-27vs Fontenot/55/3.5/WD/OCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJudi Boudreaux / Judy Landry vs Chauntelle Crappell / Michelle Mixon7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAnnette Arton / Kristina Suire vs Claudette Comeaux / Melissa Gauthier6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-02-20vs Disotell/55/3.5/WD/BEVRLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Hardy / Kathleen Gidman vs Glenda Tucker / Andrea Simon3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Cradeur / Manda Harson vs Rochelle Disotell / Mary Gretchen Guilliot4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnnette Arton / Lisa Sudduth vs Jennifer Eisler / Jonnie Sonnier4-6, 0-6
2026-02-13vs Broussard/55/3.5/WD/YSCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJudi Boudreaux / Kathleen Gidman vs Shelia Landry / Alexis Delcambre7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBecky Pye / Kristina Suire vs Kristine Broussard / Suzanne Abraham3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSandra Lebouef / Paula Cradeur vs Mary Orgeron / Stephanie Lassalle1-6, 3-6
2026-02-06vs Pearson/55/3.5/WD/REDSLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Hardy / Kristina Suire vs Dailene Melancon / Rene Pearson4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBecky Pye / Manda Harson vs Susan Laughlin / Cecelia Roman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Sudduth / Katie Vincent vs Staci Overton / Carla Moylan2-6, 0-6
2026-01-31vs Domingue/55/3.5/WD/REDSLost 03
L#1 DoublesPeggy Chappell / Lisa Sudduth vs Penny Gennuso / Tammy Broussard2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSusan Hardy / Judi Boudreaux vs Jennifer Latiolais / Patti Domingue1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesScarlet Pettit / Judy Landry vs Angela Cagle / Julie Pilgrim1-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 LAF (55&O) Women - Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Domingue/55/3.5/WD/REDS7020110143
2Pearson/55/3.5/WD/REDS6117411130
3Disotell/55/3.5/WD/BEVR5216514160
4Broussard/55/3.5/WD/YSC43101122185
5Lebouef/55/3.5/WD/REDS3491230208
6Hampton/55/3.5/WD/OCC2551632217
7Fontenot/55/3.5/WD/OCC1631838239
8Benoit/55/3.5/WD/REDS0741737230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Kristina Suire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Becky Pye
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kathleen Gidman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Judi Boudreaux
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Paula Cradeur
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Lisa Sudduth
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.01
Annette Arton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Judy Landry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Manda Harson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Peggy Chappell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Lebouef
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Scarlet Pettit
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Pye + Kristina Suire2451% games+4.1% vs expected
Scarlet Pettit + Judi Boudreaux123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristina Suire
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Becky Pye
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
Kathleen Gidman
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Judi Boudreaux
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Paula Cradeur
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.12
Lisa Sudduth
8W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01
3.5
Annette Arton
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
Judy Landry
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Manda Harson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peggy Chappell
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Lebouef
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Scarlet Pettit
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.