Teams

UTC - Choisnet

2024 LEECHARLOTTE Adult 18 & Over Spring · 3.5 W Tuesday EVE

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesSherri Campbell / Lisa Yeslow vs Jean Belcher / Kathy Sherwood6-3, 6-0
2024-05-14vs Gateway - BlackmonLost 01
L#2 DoublesSherri Campbell / Christine Gakenheimer vs Sarah Catala / Bonita Spight-Williams6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-05-07vs Cypress - ManiboLost 01
L#1 DoublesSherri Campbell / Lisa Yeslow vs Leticia Garcia / Marilyn Kole2-6, 0-6
2024-04-17vs Heritage Palms - JohnsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Yeslow / Sherri Campbell vs Janey Cahill / Pamela Baumgart6-2, 6-4
2024-04-09vs Gateway - BlackmonWon 10
W#1 DoublesSherri Campbell / Lisa Yeslow vs Lucia Parvan / Sarah Catala7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Tuesday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Ana Monahan
published 4
3.68
Patricia Sareh
published
3.59
Nancy Aloia
published
3.52
3.43
Beryl Gonzalez
published 3.5
3.36
J Q Hall
published 3.5
3.35
Sherri Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Daniela Kloos
published 3.5
3.23
Janet Choisnet
published
2.95
Mary Lowe
published
Lisa Yeslow
published
Sigalit Sphatt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Choisnet + J Q Hall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ana Monahan
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
Patricia Sareh
26W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.68
Nancy Aloia
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.59
3.5
Christina Candelario
90W–47L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Beryl Gonzalez
17W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
J Q Hall
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.36
Sherri Campbell
198W–138L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Christine Gakenheimer
1W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Daniela Kloos
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janet Choisnet
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Mary Lowe
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.95
Lisa Yeslow
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sigalit Sphatt
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.