Teams

Cypress - Manibo

2024 LEECHARLOTTE Adult 18 & Over Spring · 3.5 W Tuesday EVE

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-18vs UTC - ChoisnetWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeticia Garcia / Amy Marinell vs Christina Candelario / Beryl Gonzalez3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-04vs Heritage Palms - JohnsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesElaine Kearney / Amy Marinell vs Janey Cahill / Lisa Pavichevich7-5, 6-3
2024-05-14vs FMRC - SandersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSara Manibo / Amy Marinell vs Nancy Sanders / Florentina Fessel6-4, 7-5
2024-04-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Fiorillo / Amy Marinell vs Christine Dickey / Nancy Johnson6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2024-04-23vs Gateway - BlackmonWon 10
W#2 DoublesSara Manibo / Amy Marinell vs Alisha Daines / Donna Douglass6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Tuesday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Amy Marinell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Sara Manibo
published
3.37
Gwen Burdzy
published
3.36
Leticia Garcia
published
3.26
Marilyn Kole
published
3.21
Laurie Stewart
published
3.20
Diana Metzger
published 3.5
3.16
Victoria Manietta
published
3.12
3.11
Nikki Tyndall
published
3.04
Christine Wiles
published 3.5
3.03
Marcia Disharoon
published
3.02
Elaine Kearney
published
2.92
Angela Sterious
published 3
Karen Fiorillo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Stewart + Amy Marinell4455% games+9.3% vs expected
Laurie Stewart + Gwen Burdzy213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Marinell + Sara Manibo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Marinell
96W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
Sara Manibo
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Gwen Burdzy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Leticia Garcia
35W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.36
Marilyn Kole
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Laurie Stewart
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Diana Metzger
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Victoria Manietta
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Christine Paraboschi
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Nikki Tyndall
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Christine Wiles
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
Marcia Disharoon
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.03
Elaine Kearney
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.02
3
Angela Sterious
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
Karen Fiorillo
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.