Teams

NNM 7.0W TCA - Graham

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over League - NNM · 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-14vs NNM 7.0W HP - BrockWon 20
W#1 DoublesDee Burton / Jennifer Graham vs Jeanne Biddle / Diane Delfrate4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMyra Herrmann / Elizabeth Briganti vs Katherine Brock / Della Mufti6-0, 6-2
2022-07-10vs NNM 7.0W Tanoan - PrichardWon 30
W#1 DoublesMonica Chewiwie-Otero / Myra Herrmann vs Cindy Hernandez-Wall / Marcie Rackow6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDee Burton / Jennifer Graham vs Sabrina Goodfellow / Jody MacGillivray6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Turpen / Margaret Wienbar vs Penny Luehring / Anne Kerr6-3, 6-1
2022-07-09vs NNM 7.0W NDB - EriksonWon 30
W#1 DoublesMargaret Wienbar / Rifka Stern vs Lisa Sly / Diane Cloud2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMonica Chewiwie-Otero / Myra Herrmann vs June Haughton / Diane Kinderwater6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Graham / Dee Burton vs Kristi Bowen / Karen Rice6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-06vs NNM 7.0W Tanoan - LaneWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Briganti / Jennifer Graham vs Dana Fotieo / Joan Yourick0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRifka Stern / Margaret Wienbar vs Bonny Gaffney / Elizabeth McGuire2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDee Burton / Myra Herrmann vs Stephanie Eker / Joan Rozzoni6-3, 6-1
2022-07-05vs NNM 7.0W JC - GoldsteinLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Graham / Elizabeth Briganti vs Alice Hwang / Katie Snapp5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Wienbar / Christine Turpen vs Diane Gutierrez / IVY LANGAN2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMyra Herrmann / Lee Sloan vs Kathleen O'Bryan / Brenda Solan7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-06-21vs NNM 7.0W SV - RussellLost 03
L#1 DoublesMonica Chewiwie-Otero / Christine Turpen vs Sylvia Trujillo / Theresa Trujillo0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Briganti / Margaret Wienbar vs Louise Palomo / Monique Archuleta3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Graham / Gwendolyn Gosney vs Diana Russell / Sheila Delelles1-6, 3-6
2022-06-18vs NNM 7.0W CC - WasloskySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMonica Chewiwie-Otero / Phyllis Lynn vs Sahreem Luergan / Aimee Richardson-Zadra1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Briganti / Margaret Wienbar vs Camille Reyes / Peggy Fason7-6, 6-2
2022-05-31vs NNM 7.0W SV - MagyaryLost 02
L#1 DoublesDee Burton / Margaret Wienbar vs MJ Gallahan / Edith Jorgio6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMyra Herrmann / Christine Turpen vs Tammy Bensch / Krista Ogden3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM 7.0W JC - Goldstein6218617192
2NNM 7.0W Tanoan - Lane6216823207
3NNM 7.0W SV - Magyary5316819171
4NNM 7.0W NDB - Erikson53141023197
5NNM 7.0W TCA - Graham44111331226
6NNM 7.0W SV - Russell44101432219
7NNM 7.0W CC - Waslosky35101428236
8NNM 7.0W Tanoan - Prichard2671737242
9NNM 7.0W HP - Brock1761839254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Margaret Wienbar
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.27
Myra Herrmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Dee Burton
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Monica Chewiwie-Otero
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Christine Turpen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Phyllis Lynn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Lee Sloan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Elizabeth Briganti
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Jennifer Graham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rifka Stern
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Myra Herrmann + Dee Burton8067% games+11.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Briganti + Myra Herrmann5356% games+7.3% vs expected
Dee Burton + Monica Chewiwie-Otero2345% games+7.0% vs expected
Dee Burton + Jennifer Graham4446% games+5.1% vs expected
Margaret Wienbar + Myra Herrmann7352% games+2.6% vs expected
Myra Herrmann + Monica Chewiwie-Otero15753% games+2.0% vs expected
Margaret Wienbar + Dee Burton6746% games+1.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Briganti + Margaret Wienbar6551% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Wienbar
101W–93L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Myra Herrmann
73W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dee Burton
84W–110L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
Monica Chewiwie-Otero
77W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Christine Turpen
38W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Phyllis Lynn
39W–62L career · 1 line in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Lee Sloan
24W–32L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Elizabeth Briganti
44W–79L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Jennifer Graham
57W–63L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rifka Stern
25W–29L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.