Teams

NNM 7.0W CC - Waslosky

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over League - NNM · 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-13vs NNM 7.0W Tanoan - LaneWon 21
W#1 DoublesSahreem Luergan / Aimee Richardson-Zadra vs Elizabeth Lopez / Joan Yourick6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCamille Reyes / Nadine Waslosky vs Kathleen Barrett / Janet Dosher7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesK Joann Clemens / Linda Simpson vs Joan Rozzoni / Stephanie Eker4-6, 5-7
2022-07-10vs NNM 7.0W SV - MagyaryLost 03
L#1 DoublesAimee Richardson-Zadra / Linda Simpson vs MJ Gallahan / Edith Jorgio4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSahreem Luergan / Kathy Clapp vs Joanne O'Keefe / Julie Bard5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCrystal Wagner-McCombs / K Joann Clemens vs Karen Barattino / Carol Pierce1-6, 0-6
2022-07-09vs NNM 7.0W JC - GoldsteinLost 12
W#1 DoublesSahreem Luergan / Aimee Richardson-Zadra vs Lisa Denning / Alice Hwang6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoanne Martin / Nadine Waslosky vs Susanne Anderson / Katie Snapp0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPeggy Fason / Linda Simpson vs Ellen Goldstein / Brenda Solan5-7, 5-7
2022-07-05vs NNM 7.0W Tanoan - PrichardLost 12
W#1 DoublesSahreem Luergan / Linda Simpson vs Marcie Rackow / Leslie Prichard6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPeggy Fason / Nadine Waslosky vs Barbara Shulman / Sabrina Goodfellow4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCrystal Wagner-McCombs / Joanne Martin vs Laurel Worth / Jody MacGillivray2-6, 1-6
2022-06-27vs NNM 7.0W NDB - EriksonLost 12
W#1 DoublesSahreem Luergan / Linda Simpson vs Lisa Sly / Monica Davis7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPeggy Fason / Diana Filliman vs Christine Ellis / Diane Kinderwater4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Clapp / Crystal Wagner-McCombs vs Diane Cloud / June Haughton1-6, 2-6
2022-06-18vs NNM 7.0W TCA - GrahamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSahreem Luergan / Aimee Richardson-Zadra vs Monica Chewiwie-Otero / Phyllis Lynn6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesCamille Reyes / Peggy Fason vs Elizabeth Briganti / Margaret Wienbar6-7, 2-6
2022-06-07vs NNM 7.0W SV - RussellLost 12
W#1 DoublesSahreem Luergan / Elizabeth Fleddermann vs Sylvia Trujillo / Beth Birky6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNadine Waslosky / K Joann Clemens vs Janet Grado / Theresa Trujillo2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Fason / Linda Simpson vs Evangeline Trujillo / Judy Barrett6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-06-05vs NNM 7.0W HP - BrockWon 21
W#1 DoublesAimee Richardson-Zadra / Sahreem Luergan vs Patty Amo / Katherine Brock6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPeggy Fason / Diana Filliman vs Colette Fitzpatrick / Celeste Guillebaud3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNadine Waslosky / Joanne Martin vs Peggy Jenner / Crystal Stein6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM 7.0W JC - Goldstein6218617192
2NNM 7.0W Tanoan - Lane6216823207
3NNM 7.0W SV - Magyary5316819171
4NNM 7.0W NDB - Erikson53141023197
5NNM 7.0W TCA - Graham44111331226
6NNM 7.0W SV - Russell44101432219
7NNM 7.0W CC - Waslosky35101428236
8NNM 7.0W Tanoan - Prichard2671737242
9NNM 7.0W HP - Brock1761839254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Sahreem Luergan
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.40
Aimee Richardson-Zadra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Peggy Fason
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.09
Nadine Waslosky
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.04
Elizabeth Fleddermann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Camille Reyes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
K Joann Clemens
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.86
Joanne Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Diana Filliman
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Crystal Wagner-McCombs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Kathy Clapp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Linda Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sahreem Luergan + Aimee Richardson-Zadra9559% games+9.7% vs expected
Sahreem Luergan + Linda Simpson7258% games+9.2% vs expected
K Joann Clemens + Joanne Martin4258% games+8.6% vs expected
Peggy Fason + Nadine Waslosky4352% games+5.6% vs expected
Elizabeth Fleddermann + Camille Reyes0637% games−4.0% vs expected
Peggy Fason + Linda Simpson2742% games−5.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Fleddermann + Nadine Waslosky1642% games−7.0% vs expected
Camille Reyes + Nadine Waslosky1439% games−10.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sahreem Luergan
113W–98L career · 8 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Aimee Richardson-Zadra
41W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
Peggy Fason
56W–85L career · 6 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
Nadine Waslosky
51W–86L career · 5 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Elizabeth Fleddermann
45W–63L career · 1 line in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.04
3.5
Camille Reyes
36W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
K Joann Clemens
98W–101L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Joanne Martin
40W–48L career · 8 lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.86
3
Diana Filliman
123W–82L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Crystal Wagner-McCombs
54W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Kathy Clapp
34W–37L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Linda Simpson
35W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.