Teams

LTFCS KALTENBACHER

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-04vs MEMPK ITENWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Grumann / Kimberly Schumacher . vs Ankie Richard / Stefanie McCarron1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-08-28vs FLYHS LEVKUSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Schumacher . / Salome D'Silva vs Jamie Roach / Kristi Creps6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnn Grumann / Rachel Rocks vs Catherine Mast / Maggie Wilson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-08-21vs CSRC LOWERYLost 01
L#2 DoublesRachel Rocks / Jennifer Madden vs Jane Corral / Jenni Ehrlin0-6, 3-6
2023-08-07vs CSRC CARPENTERWon 10
W#1 SinglesKimberly Schumacher . vs Jennifer Kapitan6-2, 6-1
2023-07-31vs CSRC MCPHERSONSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSalome D'Silva / Cindy Yetter vs Wendy Rhoten / Sara Scroggins3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Rocks / Jennifer Madden vs Julia Faustman / Kateri Kerwin4-6, 4-6
2023-07-24Won 20
W#1 SinglesKimberly Schumacher . vs CLAUDIA GRAVER6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSalome D'Silva / Ann Grumann vs Carmen Ekblad / Anne Ryals6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Judy Kaltenbacher
published
3.75
Rachel Rocks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Ann Grumann
published 4
3.60
Kimberly Schumacher .
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Kateri Kaltenbacher
published
3.55
Salome D'Silva
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Janae Kite
published
Susan Hilton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Kaltenbacher + Kateri Kaltenbacher4353% games−1.6% vs expected
Ann Grumann + Salome D'Silva1540% games−3.3% vs expected
Judy Kaltenbacher + Salome D'Silva5152% games−4.0% vs expected
Judy Kaltenbacher + Ann Grumann3249% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Schumacher . + Salome D'Silva2352% gamesnot enough data
Susan Hilton + Janae Kite123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judy Kaltenbacher
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Rachel Rocks
40W–74L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Ann Grumann
12W–16L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Kimberly Schumacher .
33W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Kateri Kaltenbacher
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Salome D'Silva
78W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Janae Kite
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
Susan Hilton
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.