Teams

MEMPK ITEN

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 4.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-04vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnkie Richard / Stefanie McCarron vs Ann Grumann / Kimberly Schumacher .6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-28vs CSRC MCPHERSONLost 01
L#2 DoublesKayla Breedlove / Bonnie Iten vs Kelly Banet / Sara Scroggins3-6, 1-6
2023-08-21vs LTFCS MOOREWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Barker / Ankie Richard vs Susan Moore / Carmen Ekblad7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKayla Breedlove / Jinna Ziegler vs Anne Ryals / Julie Haynie6-2, 6-1
2023-08-14vs CSRC CARPENTERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnkie Richard / Nancy Barker vs Patty Carpenter / Jennifer Kapitan6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKayla Breedlove / Maggie Hartman vs Sandra Cook / DARLENE WARMOUTH4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-08-12vs CSRC LOWERYWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnkie Richard / Cheryl Gorthy vs Amy Laird / Jane Corral6-2, 6-3
2023-08-07vs FLYHS LEVKUSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKayla Breedlove / Noriko Moody vs Kristi Creps / Jamie Roach2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAnkie Richard vs Martina Levkus7-5, 6-3
2023-07-24vs PBTC TUCKERWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnkie Richard / Stefanie McCarron vs Julie Larson / Leah Ann Tucker6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Ankie Richard
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4.5
3.86
Nancy Barker
published
3.76
Noriko Moody
published
3.73
Stefanie McCarron
published
3.69
Bonnie Iten
published 4
3.67
Cheryl Gorthy
published 4
3.67
Kayla Breedlove
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.33
Maggie Hartman
published
Jinna Ziegler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kayla Breedlove + Bonnie Iten213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ankie Richard
130W–55L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
4.37
Nancy Barker
54W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
Noriko Moody
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Stefanie McCarron
33W–28L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Bonnie Iten
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Cheryl Gorthy
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Kayla Breedlove
43W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Maggie Hartman
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.33
Jinna Ziegler
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.