Teams

LTFCS MOORE

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

7 players · average NTRP 3.71 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-27vs CSRC MCPHERSONWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Moore / Carmen Ekblad vs Carolayne Henry / Kateri Kerwin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-28vs CSRC CARPENTERSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnne Ryals / Carmen Ekblad vs Jennifer Emerson / Kristen Lange1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Scruggs / Julie Haynie vs Patty Carpenter / DARLENE WARMOUTH6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-21vs MEMPK ITENLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Moore / Carmen Ekblad vs Nancy Barker / Ankie Richard5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Ryals / Julie Haynie vs Kayla Breedlove / Jinna Ziegler2-6, 1-6
2023-08-14vs FLYHS LEVKUSLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Moore / Terri Plummer vs Leslie Jaworowski / Chelsey Wright6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCarmen Ekblad vs Martina Levkus1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Scruggs / Julie Haynie vs Elayna Rathmann / Catherine Mast2-6, 5-7
2023-08-07vs CSRC LOWERYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTerri Plummer / Charlie Bishop vs Kristen Lowery / Jenni Ehrlin7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarmen Ekblad / Deborah Scruggs vs Tracy Glaser / Sara Breese4-6, 4-6
2023-07-31vs PBTC TUCKERWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharlie Bishop / Terri Plummer vs Ursula Duran / Bailey Kilmer7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-07-24vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCharlie Bishop / Terri Plummer vs Kateri Kaltenbacher / Judy Kaltenbacher4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarmen Ekblad / Anne Ryals vs Salome D'Silva / Ann Grumann1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
CLAUDIA GRAVER
published 4
Charlie Bishop
published 4
3.58
Deborah Scruggs
published 4
3.39
Carmen Ekblad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Terri Plummer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Julie Haynie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Anne Ryals
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Plummer + Charlie Bishop3441% gamesnot enough data
Julie Haynie + Carmen Ekblad4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
CLAUDIA GRAVER
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.97
4
Charlie Bishop
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Deborah Scruggs
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Carmen Ekblad
81W–72L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Terri Plummer
57W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Julie Haynie
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Anne Ryals
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.