Teams

Team Veres (CONFIRMED)

USTA Atlanta Summer - Combo Doubles 18 & Over Qualifier · 7.5 Women (Harrison Tennis Center)

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-09vs USTA Atlanta/Karen Webb-SmithLost 12
W#1 DoublesCandace Cole / Lauren Veres vs Akisha Paige-Bey / Marsha Johnson8-2
L#2 DoublesSandra Montana / Andrea Fernandez vs Tammy Neal / Karen Webb-Smith8-9
L#3 DoublesJessica Noblit / Sarah Barton Corr vs Rashidah Hasan / Tiara McClain7-9
2025-08-09vs Team Beaver (CONFIRMED)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJessica Noblit / Mary Pharr vs Kara O'Neill / Heather Windbiel4-8
W#2 DoublesStacey Tuchmann / Andrea Fernandez vs Gina Haylett / Denise Beniamino8-3
L#3 DoublesCandace Cole / Carla Price vs Laurie Lanzo / Elizabeth Beaver7-9
2025-08-09vs Team Knox (CONFIRMED)Won 21
W#1 DoublesSandra Montana / Lauren Veres vs Shannon Valentine / Katie Warechowski8-4
L#2 DoublesTina Parker / Mary Pharr vs Teresa Knox / Shari DeLuryea5-8
W#3 DoublesStacey Tuchmann / Carla Price vs Stephanie Miller / Tracy Haff8-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 7.5 Women (Harrison Tennis Center)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Monahan (CONFIRMED)2163352
2USTA Atlanta/Karen Webb-Smith2163351
3Team Rowell (CONFIRMED)2154452
4Team Beaver (CONFIRMED)2145558
5Team Morgan (CONFIRMED)1245557
6Team Veres (CONFIRMED)1245558
7Team Knox (CONFIRMED)1245566
8Team Harvey (CONFIRMED)1236664

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Sandra Montana
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Lauren Veres
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Mary Pharr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Candace Cole
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Jessica Noblit
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Andrea Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Stacey Tuchmann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Tina Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Carla Price
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Linda Lahue
published
3.10
Sarah Barton Corr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Veres + Sandra Montana4161% games+10.3% vs expected
Mary Pharr + Tina Parker2353% games+7.1% vs expected
Candace Cole + Tina Parker7154% games+5.5% vs expected
Stacey Tuchmann + Tina Parker5256% games+3.5% vs expected
Lauren Veres + Candace Cole7451% games+0.4% vs expected
Jessica Noblit + Mary Pharr4256% gamesnot enough data
Mary Pharr + Lauren Veres3255% gamesnot enough data
Mary Pharr + Candace Cole134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra Montana
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
Lauren Veres
32W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
Mary Pharr
29W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.52
4
Candace Cole
42W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Jessica Noblit
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Andrea Fernandez
30W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Stacey Tuchmann
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.33
Tina Parker
28W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.33
3.5
Carla Price
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.28
Linda Lahue
37W–44L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Sarah Barton Corr
16W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.